Fermionic Field Time Ordering: Understanding the Time Ordered Contraction

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Avogadro Number
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contraction Qft Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the time-ordered contraction of a fermionic field, specifically the expression <0|T(ψ(x)ψ(y))|0>. This formulation is essential for preserving causality in quantum field theory, as the time-ordering operator ensures that operators are applied in the correct temporal sequence. The participants highlight the importance of understanding time-dependent operators and the implications of commutation rules in this context. Additionally, they mention the possibility of defining time-ordering for both fermionic and bosonic fields, as well as exploring various ordering concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts
  • Familiarity with time-dependent operators
  • Knowledge of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of causality in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of time-ordering in quantum field theory
  • Explore the implications of commutation rules for fermionic fields
  • Research the differences between time-ordering and anti-time ordering
  • Investigate advanced topics such as multiple time contours in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum field theorists, and students of advanced quantum mechanics seeking to deepen their understanding of time-ordering in fermionic fields and its implications for causality.

Avogadro Number
Messages
20
Reaction score
2
Hello,

I am struggling to see why for a fermionic field $\psi$, one has the time ordered contraction $<0|T(\psi(x)\psi(y))|0>$. Could someone offer an outline/hints to see this please? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Essentially, it's to preserve causality. You have a time-ordering operator so that ##\mathcal{O}(t_2)## is applied after ##\mathcal{O}(t_1)##. Remember that ##\psi## is a time-dependent operator in this case, and unless otherwise stated, ##x^0## needn't equal ##y^0##.
 
Yes, thanks for this. Is there a way to see this mathematically based on the commutation rules?
 
Can you expand on your question? One can define time-ordering for either fermionic or bosonic fields, or one can consider other notions of ordering (anti-time ordering, retarded, advanced, and more complicated combinations if you're using a formalism with multiple time contours). Are you maybe asking how time-ordering shows up in specific places?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K