Feymman's theory, double slit experiment - Stephen Hawking

jaumzaum
Messages
433
Reaction score
33
Hi all,

I was studying Stephen Hawking's new book (very good, by the way). He was explainning Feymann's theory, that says a particle travels by all the ways possible to reach a given point. So single particles CAN have interference by themselves. Then he explain why, in the double slit experiment, if we try to take a picture of the particle at the moment it pass by the slit, to see in which slit it passes by, the interference disappears. SW says we change medium and its possible past(??) as we take a picture, and by far as I've understood, we change the medium because the photons collide with the particles, and changes its direction.

1. The first question is about this. I can't see why a single photon preclude all the other Freymann's trajectories the particle could have. Especially if they are big particles as fulerens.

And then SW explains John Wheeler experiment, where we take the picture only a moment before it collides with the screen.

2. As the particles have already passed by the slits, it should have already suffered interference, so why isn't there fringes anymore?

Thank you all by this exellent forum that helped me a lot!
And I'm really sorry if you notice some mistakes in my english. I'm brazilian :\

[]'s
John
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nobody?
 
jaumzaum said:
SW says we change medium and its possible past(??) as we take a picture, and by far as I've understood, we change the medium because the photons collide with the particles, and changes its direction.

There is no need for time reversal, it is explainable without that.

jaumzaum said:
1. The first question is about this. I can't see why a single photon preclude all the other Freymann's trajectories the particle could have. Especially if they are big particles as fulerens.

No one knows but there are various interpretations on/about that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top