Feynman Lectures Volume 3 Equation 9.41

vappole
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I don't understand how the last equation in the attached picture is derived from equations 9.40 and 9.39, can anyone help?
 

Attachments

  • Picture 1.png
    Picture 1.png
    57.6 KB · Views: 494
Physics news on Phys.org
Do the substitution as described and use the fact that ##\mu\epsilon## is small compared with ##A##.
The last equation is for the LHS only of eq.9.39 ... where ##C_I## is given in the first equation in 9.40.
 
Last edited:
Oh, I got it. Tx
 
No worries - the RHS in the last equ. looks a lot like the RHS in equ.9.39 so I expect that's what threw you. I suspect that Feynman exploits the similarity on the next page.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top