Feynman rules and decay process

jc09
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Hi I need help to understand Feynman rules for decay for exams. In past paper there is the following question as whether the following are allowed.

cc decays to tau++tau-. From What I can see this is possible via the strong force is this correct?

The next is cc decays to cu and cu. From what I can this this can't happen but is this correct?

In these question c is the antiparticle
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second process can happen.
One of the initial particles, say c, can release a gluon which can produce a pair of u quarks.
 
jc09 said:
Hi I need help to understand Feynman rules for decay for exams. In past paper there is the following question as whether the following are allowed.

cc decays to tau++tau-. From What I can see this is possible via the strong force is this correct?

This is certainly wrong: the tau is a lepton and leptons do not interact via strong force.
IMHO, this decay is possible via electroweak interactions: c and c-bar annihilate into a virtual Z-boson or photon, which in turn decays into the pair of leptons.

jc09 said:
The next is cc decays to cu and cu. From what I can this this can't happen but is this correct?

In these question c is the antiparticle

This is kinematically forbidden (energy conservation): the outgoing particles would be in sum heavier than the decay parent.
 
As far as ccbar goes, it depends on what you mean by "decay". If both are at rest with respect to each other, then ccbar -> c ubar + u cbar is forbidden. If they have enough energy to overcome the 2m_u barrier you need to start that reaction, then you're fine and it's allowed.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top