A Feynman solution for the radial wave function of the hydrogen atom

emilionovati
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Problema in the interpretation of the Feynman solution of the Schrodinger equation for the hydrogen atom
Reading the classical Feynman lectures, I encounter the formula(19.53) that gives the radial component of the wave function:
$$
F_{n,l}(\rho)=\frac{e^{-\alpha\rho}}{\rho}\sum_{k=l+1}^n a_k \rho^k
$$
that, for ##n=l+1## becomes
$$
F_{n,l}=\frac{e^{-\rho/n}}{\rho}a_n\rho^n
$$
To find ##a_n## I use the recursive formula (19.50), but here I have problem. Using $k+1=n=l+1$ I find a division by zero.

$$
a_n =\frac{2\left( \frac{n-1}{n}-1 \right)}{(n-1)n-(n-1)n}
$$

so clearly I have a mistake. But where is it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I observe denominator of (19.50) is
n(n-1)-l(l-1)
for k=n-1. As ##n \geq l+1## it is not zero.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
But, in the (19.50) the denominator is
$$
k(k+1)-l(l+1)
$$
that, for ##k=n-1## becomes
$$
(n-1)n-l(l+1)
$$
and, since ##n=l+1## we have
$$
(n-1)n-(n-1)n
$$
 
Feynman says "This means that k must start at l+1 and end at n."
Your case, ##k=n-1=(l+1)-1=l##, does not satisfy it.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
The general formula is ##n=n_r+l+1##, where the radial quantum number ##n_r \in \mathbb{N}_0=\{0,1,2,\ldots\}## and the orbital-angular-momentum quantum number ##l \in \{0,1,2,\ldots \}##. The principle quantum number ##n \in \mathbb{N}=\{1,2,\ldots \}##. Usually the hydrogen energy eigenstates (neglecting spin) are labeled by ##(n,l,m)## (where the magnetic quantum number ##m \in \{-l,-l+2,\ldots,l-1,l\}##). The energy eigenvalues are ##E_n=-\frac{m_e e^4}{2 (4 \pi \epsilon)^2 \hbar^2 n^2}=-1 \text{Ry}/n^2## with ##1 \text{Ry} \simeq 13.6 \; \text{eV}##; ##n## is thus called the principal quantum number (that the ##E_n## do not independently depend on ##n_r## and ##l## is due to the dynamical O(4) symmetry of the hydrogen bound states; ##E_n## is ##n^2## fold degenerate).

Since ##n_r =n-l-1 \geq 0## for a given ##n## the possible values for ##l## are ##0,1,\ldots n-1##.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top