Feynmann diagram for photoemission process

  • Thread starter Thread starter arrektor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram Process
arrektor
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello,

is there a representation of the process taking place in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, describing the interaction of an incoming photon with the electron of the atom?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
X-ray scattering is dominated by the Compton effect which is the scattering of photons with quasi-free electrons.

Do you want to take corrections due to binding energy of electrons into account? This will certainly not be a "single Feynman diagram"
 
I have the basic diagram for Compton scattering in mind, with electron and photon interacting at the left and an electron and photon coming out at right.
If the binding energy of the electrons is not taken into account, would the process be similar to the basic diagram of Compton scattering?
 
w/o binding energy it would be *exactly* Compton scattering!

Taking the initial state of the electron i.e. its binding energy (which may be large for K-shell electrons in heavy elements) into account one should get something like a "form factor" for the vertex.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top