Feynman's explanation of atomic collisions in gas

In summary, Feynman explains in his lectures that in a gas composed of two monoatomic gasses with different masses, the collisions between atoms will result in equal probabilities of finding any pair moving in any direction in space. He uses the example of a sphere centered at a collision point to illustrate this concept, stating that any area on the surface of the sphere will have equal probabilities of being hit by the colliding particles. This is because the direction of the particles is random and cannot be predicted. Feynman also discusses the relationship between kinetic energy and temperature in this context. In response to the questions, Feynman further explains the concept of random direction and the mathematical representation of this phenomenon. He also mentions that the average value of
  • #1
themagiciant95
57
5
In the first volume of his lectures' books, Feynman tries to mathematically describe that in a particular gas ( particular because in this case is the sum of 2 monoatomic gasses with different masses) as a result of the collisions beetween atoms it will be equally likely to find any pair moving in any direction in space , and to mathematically explain this, says:

The idea is that any area on a sphere centered at a collision point will have just
as many molecules going through it as go through any other equal area on the
sphere. So the result of the collisions will be to distribute the directions so that
equal areas on a sphere will have equal probabilities.

The paragraph in question is the 39-13 of the first volume. It's about the relation beetween kinetic energy and temperature.
I have 2 questions:

1) Could you explain me better what this sentence means?
2) If you know, why he use this example to explain the motion of the piston beetween 2 monoatomic gasses ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I will try to answer your first question, but I didn't read the book, so I'll try my best. Imagine to "draw" a sphere centered in point of collision of two molecules like this:
200533-83b493cd12eea4eb4e5e9e2bb02ebaab.jpg

(I found this online just to give you an example, but it will work with different particles and with a sphere of arbitrary radius).

You don't know nothing about the particles: you don't know the direction where they come from and so you can't predict the direction they will take after the impact.

Consider the area on the surface of the sphere that one particle will "hit" (go through) as it enters the sphere. Than en equal area should be "created" when the particle exits the sphere (after the collision). It is obvious that the two areas have to be the same because the are "created" by te same particle.

How many of these areas can you draw on the surface of the sphere? An infinite number (!) because the particles can arrive from any direction (note that you don't know anything about the particles so you can't choose a direction: you have to consider all the infinite possibility).

And agin since you don't know anything about te direction of the molecules you have to consider that any of areas that we discussed previously (on the surface of the sphere) has the same probability to be "hit". So, since those areas are connected to the direction of the molecules, every direction has the same probability to be taken.

That's how I figured it out, let me know. Sorry but I didn't read the book, so I don't know the example you are referring to in the second question.
 

Attachments

  • scontro.png
    scontro.png
    2.3 KB · Views: 556
  • #3
First Feynman explains that an elastic collision of two particles will cause a random change of direction of the colliding particles. Seems that many random changes of direction are needed to make the direction random, probably because the random changes of direction are most probably small random changes of direction.Then Feynman tells us how "the direction has now become random" can be said in mathematics.
 
  • #4
Suppose we have 2 particles colliding ,a particle has a velocity v1 and the other v2.
Is it true that i can find infinite combinations of v1-v2 that gives a certain Center of Mass Velocity ?

This because, Feynman goes on : (always about the collision of 2 particles)

"Now then, what is the distribution resulting from this? From our previous
argument we conclude this: that at equilibrium, all directions for w are equally
likely, relative to the direction of the motion of the CM.
There will be no
particular correlation, in the end, between the direction of the motion of the
relative velocity and that of the motion of the CM.

So the cosine of the
angle between w and vCM is zero on the average. That is:
[tex]<\bar{w}\cdot \bar{V}_{cm}>=0[/tex]

Where w is v1-v2 and Vcm is the Center of mass' velocity"

In addition, what's the intuitive and practical meaning of
"So the cosine of the angle between w and vCM is zero on the average."
 
  • #5
In addition to the last reply:

In writing
[tex]<\bar{w}\cdot \bar{v}_{cm}> = 0 [/tex] for the collision of 2 particles of a gas composed of 2 monoatomic gasses with different masses (situated in a box), i think that he implicity extend this formula to all the collisions in the gas.
But how the average can be 0 is the Vcm and the w may vary.

All this will be ok if we can demonstrate that the velocity of the particles are equally distributed around an average value. The problem is that is probably the obiective of the demonstration
 
Last edited:

What is Feynman's explanation of atomic collisions in gas?

Feynman's explanation of atomic collisions in gas is a theoretical model proposed by physicist Richard Feynman to understand the behavior of atoms during collisions in a gas. It is based on the principles of quantum mechanics and considers the atomic particles as wave-like entities rather than solid objects.

Why is Feynman's explanation important in understanding atomic collisions in gas?

Feynman's explanation is important because it provides a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the behavior of atoms during collisions in a gas. It takes into account the wave nature of particles and can explain phenomena that cannot be explained by classical theories.

Can Feynman's explanation be applied to all types of gases?

Yes, Feynman's explanation can be applied to all types of gases. It is a general theoretical model that can be used to understand the behavior of atoms in any gas, regardless of its composition or state.

How does Feynman's explanation differ from classical theories of atomic collisions?

Feynman's explanation differs from classical theories in that it considers atoms as wave-like entities rather than solid particles. It also takes into account the uncertainty principle and other principles of quantum mechanics, which allows for a more accurate description of atomic behavior during collisions.

What are the practical applications of Feynman's explanation of atomic collisions in gas?

Feynman's explanation has many practical applications in fields such as chemistry, physics, and materials science. It can help in understanding and predicting the behavior of gases at different temperatures and pressures, as well as in designing and optimizing gas-based technologies such as gas sensors and gas turbines.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
32
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Mechanics
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
Back
Top