Fiber Optic PPR biochemicals detection sensor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a query regarding the meaning of "(n=500)" in the context of the "Preparation of AuNP" section of a journal article about fiber optic-particle plasmon resonance biosensors integrated with microfluidic chips. It is clarified that "(n=500)" refers to the number of nanoparticles used for size analysis in the study. The original poster expresses gratitude for the clarification and acknowledges the removal of the PDF attachment to avoid copyright issues. The focus remains on understanding specific technical details of the research. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of precise terminology in scientific literature.
Nithya
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was reading this journal on FO-PPR sensor and had a doubt. Couldn't exactly google for an answer as it was unclear.
"Integration of fiber optic-particle plasmon resonance biosensor with microfluidic
chip" by a group of scientists.
I have attached the pdf.
Under the section "Preparation of AuNP" , it had (n=500) written in the end. I couldn't figure out what it meant .
I will appreciate it , if you clear my doubt .

Edit by Borek: pdf removed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nithya said:
Under the section "Preparation of AuNP" , it had (n=500) written in the end. I couldn't figure out what it meant

Number of nanoparticles used for size analysis.

I am deleting the attachment, posting it here almost for sure breaks copyright.
 
Thanks Borek.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

How Do Fiber Optic Current Sensors Work in Substations?
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top