Field between Parallel Plates in a Capacitor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric field between parallel plates in a capacitor, exploring the relationship between electric potential, electric field, and the configuration of the plates. Participants delve into theoretical derivations, mathematical formulations, and the implications of boundary conditions in the context of electrostatics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the electric field magnitude is given by the formula ##E=(\phi_1 - \phi_2)/s## and seeks a derivation for this relationship.
  • Another participant explains that the voltage difference between the plates relates to the work done on a test charge, leading to the equation ##E=\frac{V}{s}##, where ##V=Φ_1-Φ_2##.
  • A follow-up question arises regarding the constancy of force ##F## in the context of the electric field and voltage relationship.
  • One participant provides a derivation based on Maxwell's equations, discussing the potential function and its behavior in relation to the plates' configuration.
  • Another participant expresses appreciation for the derivation but seeks clarification on why the potential must remain finite outside the plates.
  • Further discussion touches on the implications of boundary conditions and the behavior of the electric field outside the plates, with emphasis on the determination of surface-charge density and capacitance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement on the derivations and implications presented. While some appreciate the mathematical explanations, others raise questions about specific assumptions and the physical meaning of certain conditions, indicating that multiple views and uncertainties remain.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of boundary conditions in determining the potential and electric field, suggesting that assumptions about the behavior of the potential outside the plates are critical to the discussion. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity regarding the implications of these assumptions.

Buffu
Messages
851
Reaction score
147
Two similar flat conducting plates are arranged parallel to one another, separated by a distance ##s##. Let the area of each plate be ##A## and suppose that there is a charge ##Q## on one plate and ##-Q## on the other. ##\phi_1## and ##\phi_2## are the potential values at each of the plates. When the field is treated uniform its magnitude must be ##(\phi_1 - \phi_2)/s##.

I guess it is a trivial fact that field must be ##(\phi_1 - \phi_2)/s## but I don't get how ? is there a derivation for it ?[/QUOTE]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The difference in electric potential (voltage) between the plates is equal to the work done on a test charge to move it from one plate to the other divided by the charge.
The equation for this is: ##V=\frac{Fd}{q}##, where ##V=ΔΦ=Φ_1-Φ_2##

A static electric field is defined as: ##E=\frac{F}{q}##

Substituting ##E## into the first equation: ##V=Ed##

Rearranging: ##E=\frac{V}{d}##, or ##E=\frac{V}{s}=\frac{Φ_1-Φ_2}{s}##

If the voltage between the plates is constant, then the magnitude of the electric field is inversely proportional to the separation between the plates.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buffu
Drakkith said:
The difference in electric potential (voltage) between the plates is equal to the work done on a test charge to move it from one plate to the other divided by the charge.
The equation for this is: ##V=\frac{Fd}{q}##, where ##V=ΔΦ=Φ_1-Φ_2##

A static electric field is defined as: ##E=\frac{F}{q}##

Substituting ##E## into the first equation: ##V=Ed##

Rearranging: ##E=\frac{V}{d}##, or ##E=\frac{V}{s}=\frac{Φ_1-Φ_2}{s}##

If the voltage between the plates is constant, then the magnitude of the electric field is inversely proportional to the separation between the plates.

Why is ##F## constant ?
 
If the voltage between the plates is held constant (this is in your hands), then the electric field between the plates is constant (and uniform), and therefore the force on a point charge q (test charge) between the plates is also constant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and Buffu
It's a solution of Maxwell's equations for infinitely extended plates, i.e., for the field not too close to the boundaries and for the distance between the plates small compared to the extension of the plates.

Now take the case of two infinite plates parallel to the ##xy## plane of a Caratesian coordinate system, one at ##z=0## and one at ##z=d##. Obviously the solution is symmetric under translations in ##x## and ##y## direction. Thus the potential should be a function of ##z## only. There are no charges anywhere, and thus
$$\Delta \phi=\phi'=0.$$
So you have
$$\phi(z)=A+B z$$
with ##A## and ##B## constants. Obviously these constants can take different values inside and outside the plates. Since the potential should stay finite in this configuration, you have ##B=0## for ##z<0## and for ##z>d##. The overall constant is arbitrary, and we can choose it to be such that ##\phi(0)=0##. Then you have
$$\phi(z)=B z \quad \text{for} \quad 0 < z < d.$$
At ##z=d## you have ##\phi(d)=U##, where ##U## is the given voltage difference between the plates, which leads to ##B=U/d## and thus
$$\phi(z)=U \frac{z}{d} \quad \text{for} \quad 0 < z < d.$$
The electric field is
$$\vec{E}=-\vec{\nabla} \phi=-\frac{U}{d} \vec{e}_z \quad \text{for} \quad 0<z<d, \quad \vec{E}=0 \quad \text{everywhere else}.$$
At the upper plate the normal component ##E_z## makes a jump of size ##\sigma=U/d##, and ##\sigma## is the surface charge. At the lower plate you get ##\sigma'=-U/d##.

For a finite but large plate you have ##\sigma=Q/A## and thus ##U/d=Q/A## or ##Q=A U/d##, i.e., the capacitance is ##C=A/d##. If there's a dielectric inside, you have ##C=\epsilon A/d##, where ##\epsilon## is the zero-frequency permittivity of the dielectric.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buffu and dextercioby
Thank you for the derivation, I think this was a really nice derivation :).

vanhees71 said:
Since the potential should stay finite in this configuration

Sorry but I fail to grasp this. If we did not take ##B = 0## for ## z \in \Bbb R - [0, d]## then why does potential is infinite ?
 
Buffu said:
Thank you for the derivation, I think this was a really nice derivation :).
Sorry but I fail to grasp this. If we did not take ##B = 0## for ## z \in \Bbb R - [0, d]## then why does potential is infinite ?
because then it gets infinite for ##z \rightarrow \infty##.
 
vanhees71 said:
because then it gets infinite for ##z \rightarrow \infty##.
Does it matter ? I mean we are only concerned with potential between the plates whatever be its value outside the plates ?
 
The point is to fulfill the boundary conditions at the plate to fully determine the potential. The boundary condition and infinity makes the electric field vanish outside of the plates, and this finally leads to the determination of the surface-charge density which permits to get the capacitance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buffu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
20K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K