Field Energy and Time Dilation in Relativistic Motion

keepit
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
a relativistically moving body passes through much more field energy than a slow moving body per unit time. Does all that field energy have anything to do with the slowing of time in the fast moving object?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cutting absolute background field lines...?
That begins to sound like an aether field which should not be measurable in any inertial reference frame.

Or what kind of field are you thinking?

Maybe a relativistically moving inertial reference frame would "see" any field lines in such a way as to appear locally "correct" and without conflict from other reference frames' views?
 
keepit said:
a relativistically moving body passes through much more field energy than a slow moving body per unit time. Does all that field energy have anything to do with the slowing of time in the fast moving object?
No. Time dilation is a reciprocal process. Your relativisically moving body sees time dilation in the slow moving body just like the slow moving body sees it in the fast moving body. Neither body notices any slowing of time for themself. This is true no matter what field energy or lack thereof is present.
 
ghwell...good way to explain it...!

I would have said "no, time dilation and length contraction are a function of relative velocity not energy".
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
45
Views
6K
Back
Top