Solving a Thought Problem: Growing a Field of Crops from Scratch

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crazyevox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field scratch
AI Thread Summary
To determine the total length of crops in a field at any given time, one must account for the number of crops that have appeared and their growth stages. For each time unit 't', 'x' new crops emerge, each growing at a constant rate 'l' until they reach a maximum length 'L'. The total length of crops can be calculated by summing the lengths of crops at various growth stages, from length 'l' to length 'L-1'. Additionally, the number of fully grown crops of length 'L' is equal to the number of crops that appeared more than 'L' time units ago, specifically calculated as 'x(t - L)'. This approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of crop growth dynamics over time.
Crazyevox
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
just a (random) thought problem I've been trying to get my mind around... :p

lets say we wish to grow a field of crops from scratch

'x' number of new baby crops 'appear' (or begin to visibly exist) on this field per time unit (Eg. days).
hence in 't' time, we will have a total of tx baby crops.

now every baby crop grows at a constant rate of 'l' (length) units per time unit from the very moment it 'appears' on the field. each crop will continue to grow at 'l' units per time unit -until- it reaches a maximum length of 'L', after which it seizes to grow.

how do i find the total length of all crops in the field at any given time?
anyone know how i could approach this? :s
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So at some (discrete) time t you will have:
x baby crops
x crops of length l
x crops of length 2l
...
x crops of length L - 1

Finally you need to count the number of crops of length L, which is all the crops which have "appeared" longer than time L ago, i.e. x(t - L). You should check this statement, you might need to take t - L - 1 or t - L + 1 or something like that... just plug in some numbers.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top