Field inside a conductor is zero

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept that the electric field inside a conductor is zero, even when a charged object is present within a hollow conducting cylinder. It clarifies that while the field inside the conductor itself is zero, a non-zero electric field can exist within the cavity if there is charge present. Participants emphasize the importance of considering induced charges on the inner surface of the cylinder, which counteract the charge from the wire. The conversation also touches on the application of Gauss's law, highlighting that the total charge must include both the wire's charge and the induced charge on the cylinder's surfaces. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that the field outside the cylinder reflects the line charge, while the inner field dynamics depend on the induced charges.
madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I know that the field inside a conductor is zero but what if there was a charged object in the cylinder I mean in some examples I see infinite charged wire inside an infinite hollow conduction cylinder with radius a
but if we take a cylindrical gaussian surface with r <a Qinside = linear density of the wire times l which isn't zero right? so why is the field zero?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
and if you could help me please do it today because tomorrow is my quiz and I can't continue studying unless I understand this point.
 
The electrostatic field within the conducting material is zero. But if you can certainly have a non-zero field within the cavity of a hollow conductor if there's charge inside the cavity.
 
ok another question in this case of a wire inside a hollow conduction cylinder is E at the surface of the cylinder equal only to sigma/epsilon naught or is it (lamba * l + sigma *A)=E*A? because the book says the field on the surface of the cylinder is sigma/epsilon
 
madah12 said:
ok another question in this case of a wire inside a hollow conduction cylinder is E at the surface of the cylinder equal only to sigma/epsilon naught or is it (lamba * l + sigma *A)=E*A? because the book says the field on the surface of the cylinder is sigma/epsilon
What does sigma represent? The surface charge on the outside of the cylinder? If so, then sigma/epsilon is correct.

In applying Gauss's law, don't forget to include all charge, including that on the inner surface of the cylinder.
 
yes sigma is the outer surface density ,so I understand so you are saying that because on the inner surface there is q induced that is equal and opposite to the one of the wire?
so even outside the surface of the cylinder Q only equals sigma outer *outer surface area?
 
madah12 said:
yes sigma is the outer surface density ,so I understand so you are saying that because on the inner surface there is q induced that is equal and opposite to the one of the wire?
so even outside the surface of the cylinder Q only equals sigma outer *outer surface area?
That's right. And if the cylinder has no net charge of its own, the field outside its surface will equal that of the line charge.
 
madah12 said:
http://physics.kuniv.edu.kw/phys102/08-09-S-ms1.pdf
look at number 5 how can the field be zero if Q=sigma *a
In that problem statement, sigma represents the total charge per unit area on the cylinder, not just the charge on its outer surface. (The problem is confusingly worded.) Think of sigma as the charge on the outer surface before the line charge is introduced. Once you include the induced charge due to the line charge, then the outer surface will have zero sigma.
 
  • #10
so sometimes they say the linear charge of a cylinder do you know what that means?
 
  • #11
madah12 said:
so sometimes they say the linear charge of a cylinder do you know what that means?
I imagine that means the total charge per unit length. (As opposed to the surface charge, which is per unit area.)
 
Back
Top