Field of variable charge distribution over all space

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the potential V(z) and electric field E(z) for a charge distribution with uniform density in the x-y directions and a varying density in the z direction, given by ρ(z) = ρ0e−|z|/t. The user is attempting to set up the integral for the electric field but is uncertain about their approach, particularly regarding the integration limits and the contributions from different components. They express confusion over the resulting integral, which seems to simplify unexpectedly, and seek feedback on their methodology. The conversation highlights the need for clearer communication of mathematical steps and encourages sharing actual calculations for better understanding. The user aims to derive the effective charge density σ in the limit of |z| ≫ t, suggesting a connection to the behavior of a uniform sheet of charge.
BenR
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charge distribution has uniform density in the x-y directions and varies with z according to: ρ(z) = ρ0e−|z|/t

where ρ0 and t are constants.

(a) Find the potential V (z) and the electric field E(z)

(b) Sketch them clearly showing their behaviors in the regions |z| ≪ t and |z| ≫ t.

(c) In the region |z| ≫ t, the system should behave as if there were a uniform sheet of charge. Find the effective charge density σ.

Homework Equations


I am not certain I'm setting up the integral for the field correctly. This is what I've set up as the integrand (I'm doing this on my phone and will do my best to be clear).

1/4pi(epsilon naught)•(rho(z)•(z-z naught) dx dy dz)/(x^2+y^2+(z-z naught)^2)^(3/2).

This is all times z hat, and integrated from
-L to L, after which I will take the limits as L goes to infinity.

I have obviously discarded x and y hats, because the charge is uniform in those directions and the non- z components will cancel, but should contribute something in the z direction. The quantity raised to the three halves is the separation vector times the denominator of the unit vector r (only the z component of which survived in the numerator).

What I'm getting is a x/sqrt(x^2+(yz terms)), and factoring out a x from under the radical and taking x to positive and negative infinity I get 1.

Left over(ignoring constants in front) is rho(z) (z-znaught)dydz/(y^2+(z-znaught)^2)

Integrating over y, I get rho(z)•(z-znaught)•1/(z-znaught)•arctan (1/y) which when evaluated from negative to positive infinity gives me pi.

So now I'm left with an integral of just rho(z) with no terms for distance which seems strange.

The Attempt at a Solution


I guess I put my attempt above. Oops. At any rate, is this a sensible way to go about this? I suppose considering I'm essentially integrating over expanding spheres a term of pi makes sense, but I can't find any similar examples to corroborate my approach. I haven't attempted the second and third parts yet but who knows what that will yield. I'd appreciate any critique or suggestions regarding methodology or set up, whether my approach is yielding what looks like a correct answer or not (it seems somewhat cumbersome but maybe it just is). In the future I will try to actually format this on my phone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have not tried following your hard-won alphanumeric equations, but what I don't see is any reference to the field at a point from an infinite uniformly charged plate. That would seem to be a useful starting point.
 
I mean... That's what I'm getting basically. I'm left with rho(z)/epsilon, and rho(0) gives me a constant which would be the surface charge density for any plane normal to the z axis. So now integrating z over infinity should yield a sensible answer
 
BenR said:
I mean... That's what I'm getting basically. I'm left with rho(z)/epsilon, and rho(0) gives me a constant which would be the surface charge density for any plane normal to the z axis. So now integrating z over infinity should yield a sensible answer
Sorry, but I can't follow what you are saying there. It would be clearer if you would post your actual working.
What is the charge density of a plate of thickness dz, normal to the z axis, passing through the ordinate z?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
727
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K