Field Theory Partition Function

unchained1978
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
The 'partition function' in QFT is written as Z=\langle 0 | e^{-i\hat H T} |0\rangle, but I'm having a difficult time really understanding this. I'm assuming that |0\rangle represents the vacuum state with no particles present. If that's the case, and the Hamiltonian acting on such a state would just produce the ground state energy, which can be defined to be zero. How does this give you anything interesting then? If e^{-i\hat H T} |0\rangle=e^{-i (0)T}|0\rangle, then I fail to see how this quantity is of any use. (I know that by adding a source to the Hamiltonian, you can calculate the interaction energy of two particles, but for a source free H I'm not sure what it does). Also, if you have a Hamiltonian of the form :\hat H:=\sum_{k}\hat a^{\dagger}_{k}\hat a_{k}, where \hat a_{k}|0\rangle=0, then I really don't get what's going on here when you write out Z. Does it only make sense to calculate this when you have a source term added?
Thanks in advance for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unchained1978 said:
The 'partition function' in QFT is written as Z=\langle 0 | e^{-i\hat H T} |0\rangle, but I'm having a difficult time really understanding this. I'm assuming that |0\rangle represents the vacuum state with no particles present.

The vacuum state is a very complicated issue in QFT. Since we usually can't solve the interacting theory exactly, we resort to perturbation theory, where

$$ H = H_0 + H_I,$$

with ##H_0## the free Hamiltonian and ##H_I## the interacting part. There are then really two vacuum states that we can define. For example, in Peskin & Schroder, ##|0\rangle## is the vacuum for the free Hamiltonian, while they use ##|\Omega\rangle## to stand for the vacuum of the full theory.

If that's the case, and the Hamiltonian acting on such a state would just produce the ground state energy, which can be defined to be zero. How does this give you anything interesting then? If e^{-i\hat H T} |0\rangle=e^{-i (0)T}|0\rangle, then I fail to see how this quantity is of any use. (I know that by adding a source to the Hamiltonian, you can calculate the interaction energy of two particles, but for a source free H I'm not sure what it does). Also, if you have a Hamiltonian of the form :\hat H:=\sum_{k}\hat a^{\dagger}_{k}\hat a_{k}, where \hat a_{k}|0\rangle=0, then I really don't get what's going on here when you write out Z. Does it only make sense to calculate this when you have a source term added?
Thanks in advance for any help

The Hamiltonian really isn't :\hat H:=\sum_{k}\hat a^{\dagger}_{k}\hat a_{k}, rather the normal-ordered free Hamiltonian has this form. Along with the normal-ordering, we're typically dropping the zero-point energy of the oscillators, so we can define the zero of energy by choosing ##H_0 |0\rangle =0##. However, once we do this, the interaction terms generally are not normal ordered, so ##H_I|0\rangle \neq 0##. The interactions can create virtual particles from the vacuum (in such a way that all charges are conserved). Therefore, the partition function is generally non-trivial and corresponds to a sum over so-called bubble diagrams, which have no external lines.
 
Thank you, I didn't think too much about what the Hamiltonian really is. Including the interaction terms gives you a non-trivial calculation, and I think I overlooked the addition of that to the total Hamiltonian.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top