MHB Fields and Field Extensions - Lovett, Chapter 7 .... ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Fields
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Abstract Algebra: Structures and Applications" by Stephen Lovett ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 7: Field Extensions ... ...

I need help with Example 7.1.5 ...Example 7.1.5 reads as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6572
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6573
In the above text from Lovett, we read the following:

" ... ... Then $$\mathbb{Q} [x] / ( p(x) ) = \mathbb{Q} [ \sqrt{5} ] $$ is a field. ... ... "
I understand that $$\mathbb{Q} [x] / ( p(x) ) = \mathbb{Q} [x] / ( x^2 - 5 ) $$ is a field ... ... but why is it equal to $$\mathbb{Q} [ \sqrt{5} ]$$ ... ...?Can someone please explain and demonstrate why the equality $$\mathbb{Q} [x] / ( x^2 - 5 ) = \mathbb{Q} [ \sqrt{5} ]$$ holds ... ?Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

Lovett means that $\Bbb Q[x]/(x^2 - 5)$ is isomorphic to $\Bbb Q[\sqrt{5}]$. Elements of $\Bbb Q[x]/(x^2 - 5)$ are of the form $a + bx + (x^2 - 5)$ where $a,b\in \Bbb Q$. Letting $x$ map to $\sqrt{5}$, we get a bijection $a + bx + (x^2 - 5)\mapsto a + b\sqrt{5}$ from $\Bbb Q[x]/(x^2 - 5)$ to $\Bbb Q[\sqrt{5}]$. This map is a homomorphism of rings, as you can check.
 
Euge said:
Hi Peter,

Lovett means that $\Bbb Q[x]/(x^2 - 5)$ is isomorphic to $\Bbb Q[\sqrt{5}]$. Elements of $\Bbb Q[x]/(x^2 - 5)$ are of the form $a + bx + (x^2 - 5)$ where $a,b\in \Bbb Q$. Letting $x$ map to $\sqrt{5}$, we get a bijection $a + bx + (x^2 - 5)\mapsto a + b\sqrt{5}$ from $\Bbb Q[x]/(x^2 - 5)$ to $\Bbb Q[\sqrt{5}]$. This map is a homomorphism of rings, as you can check.

Thanks for the help, Euge... appreciate it ...

Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K