Figuring Out the Radius of Curvature for Separating CO & N2 on Film

AI Thread Summary
To determine the radius of curvature for separating CO and N2 molecules in a spectrometer, the relevant equation is r = mv/qB', where the variables include mass (m), charge (q), magnetic field (B'), and velocity (v). Since the masses of CO and N2 are nearly identical, their velocities can be assumed to be the same. The separation of 0.50 mm on the film corresponds to the difference in their circular paths, which can be calculated using the mass ratio to find the required radius. The key is to relate the mass difference to the radius difference, allowing for the calculation of the necessary radius for proper separation. Understanding these principles will help in solving the problem effectively.
kashmirekat
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
I have two molecules CO and N2 with masses 28.0106u and 28.0134u respectively.

I need to determine the radius of curvature the spectrometer must have if the molecules are to be separated on film by 0.50mm.

I don't even know where to begin to solve this. The only equation relating to it in the book is m=qB'r/v, where r=mv/qB'. But I don't have v or q or B'. Agghhh.

Mco=28.0106u
Mn2=28.0134u
d=0.50mm
r=?

Would someone point me in the right direction? Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
kashmirekat,

Since the molecules have mass, Newton's 1st law says they'll travel at a constant speed, v, and in a constant direction unless there's a force applied to them. The force is from the magnetic field B. It's magnitude is given by qvB, and its direction is always perpendicular to v. This means the molecules will travel in a circle.

But how big is the circle? The acceleration of an object going in a circle turns out to be v^2/r. This makes sense because the smaller r is, the faster the particle is has to be changing is direction (hich is one form of acceleration) and the faster its going the faster it's making that turn.

Now we apply Newton's 2nd law that says F = ma. So write this equation for each of your molecules, and see if that helps you understand what's going on.

Also, you might check your book where it talks about mass spectrometers, but usually the way they work is to send all the molecules through a little device called a velocity selector so that everything coming out is going at the same speed. You can probably assume this even if your book doesn't say it (because I think you have to!).

Try messing around with all that for a while, and see what you come up with.
 
Okay, I understand that their is going to be a circular path due to the magnetic force (E field) and that since the masses of the molecules are nearly the same, their velocity is going to be the same too. However, I do not understand where the .5mm is integrated into the equation.

I'm sorry for not understanding, it just hasn't clicked yet as to how to work out this problem. So frustrating...
 
kashmirekat said:
Okay, I understand that their is going to be a circular path due to the magnetic force (E field) and that since the masses of the molecules are nearly the same, their velocity is going to be the same too. However, I do not understand where the .5mm is integrated into the equation.
The circular paths have different radii, thus they will hit the detector at different positions. (Think of the particles as swinging around in a semicircle: distance from initial position = diameter of circle.) The position on the detector is a function of the mass. The question is: What must the radius be (of the larger path say) so that the difference in where they hit the detector is 0.5mm?
 
The answer to the problem involved taking the ratio of masses to the ratio of r. m/[delta]m=[delta]r/r . Where [delta]r = .5mm

Thank you for your help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top