Final part of determining an equivalence relation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining whether a relation defined on real numbers, where \( a \sim b \) if \( |a-b| \leq 1 \), is an equivalence relation. The original poster has completed some parts of the analysis but is struggling with the transitive property.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to show that if \( |a-b| \leq 1 \) and \( |b-c| \leq 1 \), then it must follow that \( |a-c| \leq 1 \). Some suggest using specific examples to test the relation, while others emphasize the necessity of a general proof.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the transitive property of the relation. Some participants suggest that finding a counterexample could suffice to demonstrate that the relation is not an equivalence relation, while others caution against relying solely on examples, advocating for a more rigorous approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the professor expects a thorough proof rather than just examples, indicating a strict grading policy that emphasizes comprehensive reasoning over simple demonstration.

kathrynag
Messages
595
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For a,b elements of the real numbers, define a~b if \left|a-b\right|\leq
1. Determine if we have an equivalence relation.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I've already done the first two parts of determining. it's only the last part that I'm having trouble with, so i will omit the first two parts.
We bwant to determine if for all a,b,c elements of S, if (a,b) is an element of R and (b,c) is an element of R, then (a,c) is an element of R.
We know \left|a-b\right|\leq1 and \left|b-c\right|\leq1.
This means a-b\leq1,b-a\leq1, b-c\leq1, and c-b\leq1.
Furthermore, a\leq1+b, b\leq1+a, b\leq1+c, c\leqb+1.
I know from this, I need to be able to show a-c\leq1 and c-a\leq1 in order to have an equivalence relation.
That's what I don't see right off hand is how to get that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about a = 0, b = 1, c = 2?
 
But that's not how to determine an equivalence relation. I can't just pick numbers because it has to work for all a, b and c.
 
kathrynag said:
it has to work for all a, b and c.

Exactly.

You might want to carefully re-read the question :)
 
Could I do something like this:
Ok if c\leq1+b and a\leq1+b.
We have c\leqa or c-a\leq0.
If a\leq1+b and c\leq1+b, we can say a\leqc or a-c\leq0.
Could I do something like that since that implies \left|a-c\right|\leq0, but we wanted \left|a-c\right|\leq1. Thus not an equivalence relation.
 
Why do you want to do it the hard way?
If it is an equivalence relation, |a - b| <= 1 and |b - c| <= 1 should imply |a - c| <= 1 for all a, b and c.
So if you can find just one pair (a, b, c) for which it's not true, you are done, right?
 
CompuChip said:
Why do you want to do it the hard way?
If it is an equivalence relation, |a - b| <= 1 and |b - c| <= 1 should imply |a - c| <= 1 for all a, b and c.
So if you can find just one pair (a, b, c) for which it's not true, you are done, right?

Well, I know my professor would not want to just see a pair since he is a very strict grader.
 
hi kathrynag! :smile:

(have a ≤) :wink:
kathrynag said:
Well, I know my professor would not want to just see a pair since he is a very strict grader.

honestly, compuchip is right …

your professor asked you to determine whether it is an equivalence relation …

if it is, then of course you have to prove it strictly … as you say, you can't just pick numbers because it has to work for all a, b and c

but if it isn't, then you prove that simply by finding one a b and c for which it doesn't work :wink:
 
Did you read this Wikipedia page I linked you to earlier (actually, the first paragraph of the introduction will do)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K