Find A Counter-Example to This

  • Thread starter Thread starter Atran
  • Start date Start date
Atran
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
Hi!

Say p(x) is the product of the first x odd prime numbers (e.g. p(4)=3*5*7*11) and i is at least one. Then consider:
1 < p(x) ± 2*i < (p(x+1)/p(x))2

My hypothesis is that the above formula, obeying the restrictions, always produces a prime number.
For example if x=3 and i=13, then p(3)-2*13=79. 79 is bigger than 1 and smaller than 112, therefore it's a prime number.

I'm not a python programmer, but this code yields prime numbers using the above formula:

Code:
from math import ceil

def is_prime(number):
    if(number < 2):
        return False
    i = 2
    while i <= ceil(number**0.5):
        if(number%i == 0):
            return False
        i = i + 1
    return True

def f(number_of_primes):
    flag = True
    prime_product = 1
    prime_array = []

    n, i = 3, 0
    while i < number_of_primes:
        if(is_prime(n) == True):
            prime_product = prime_product * n
            prime_array.append(n)
            i = i + 1
        n = n + 1
    
    while True:
        if(is_prime(n) == True):
            largest_prime = n
            break
        n = n + 1

    i = 1
    while True:
        for x in range(len(prime_array)):
            if(i%prime_array[x] == 0):
                flag = False
                break

        if flag == False:
            flag = True
            i = i + 1
            continue
        
        n = prime_product - 2*i
        if n <= 1:
            break
        if n < largest_prime**2:
            if is_prime(n) == False:
                print("NOT : ", n, " : ", i)
                break
            else:
                print("NMB : ", n, " : ", i)
        i = i + 1

def g(number_of_primes):
    flag = True
    prime_product = 1
    prime_array = []

    n, i = 3, 0
    while i < number_of_primes:
        if(is_prime(n) == True):
            prime_product = prime_product * n
            prime_array.append(n)
            i = i + 1
        n = n + 1
    
    while True:
        if(is_prime(n) == True):
            largest_prime = n
            break
        n = n + 1

    i = 1
    while True:
        for x in range(len(prime_array)):
            if(i%prime_array[x] == 0):
                flag = False
                break

        if flag == False:
            flag = True
            i = i + 1
            continue
        
        n = prime_product + 2*i
        if n < largest_prime**2:
            if is_prime(n) == False:
                print("NOT : ", n, " : ", i)
                break
            else:
                print("NMB : ", n, " : ", i)
        else:
            break
        i = i + 1

x = 4 # Enter a non-negative integer
f(x)
print("- - - - -")
g(x)
Scroll down and assign a non-negative integer to x in the code and run it. If the program detects a non-prime then it should output "NOT" followed by the generated number. If the generated number is a prime, then it outputs "NMB". The second number after the second colon is the value of i. So the above example would be displayed as: "NMB : 79 : 13" (excluding the double quotes)

Thanks for help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What is your question? to find a counter example? or to prove your conjecture?
 
I want somebody to prove this wrong, by finding a counter example.

And I'm really sorry, I forgot to mention that i must not be divisible by any of the primes found in the product p(x).

So again,
1 < p(x) ± 2*i < (p(x+1)/p(x))2
where p(x) is the product of the first x odd prime numbers, and i is a positive integer not divisible by any prime in the product p(x).


Example: p(4) - 2*514 = 127.
514 is positive and not divisible by 3, 5, 7, or 11. And 127 is less than 169, so according to the conjecture 127 should be a prime, and it is.
 
Your best strategy here would be to let the program find the counter example by finding a list of primes for input and then running it thru its paces. Also if you could find a related program that can check for primeness of a number you could incorporate it into the mix.
 
Atran said:
I want somebody to prove this wrong, by finding a counter example.

And I'm really sorry, I forgot to mention that i must not be divisible by any of the primes found in the product p(x).

So again,
1 < p(x) ± 2*i < (p(x+1)/p(x))2
where p(x) is the product of the first x odd prime numbers, and i is a positive integer not divisible by any prime in the product p(x).


Example: p(4) - 2*514 = 127.
514 is positive and not divisible by 3, 5, 7, or 11. And 127 is less than 169, so according to the conjecture 127 should be a prime, and it is.

It's a true conjecture. Here's a proof:

First, we note that since ##p(x)## is not divisible by ##2## and ##2i## is divisible by ##2##, then ##p(x) - 2i## is not divisible by ##2##.
Second, if ##p## is an odd prime occurring in the product of ##p(x)##, then ##p## divides ##p(x)## and ##p## does not divide ##2i##, thus ##p## does not divide ##p(x) - 2i##.

So we deduce that if ##p## is any prime dividing ##p(x)-2i##, then ##p## cannot occur in ##p(x)##. Thus ##p\geq p(x+1)/p(x)##.

So, assume that ##p(x) - 2i## is composite, then there are there are two prime numbers ##p## and ##q## that divide ##p(x) - 2i##. Thus we have ##pq\leq p(x)-2i##. But we also have that ##p\geq p(x+1)/p(x)## and ##q\geq p(x+1)/p(x)##. Thus ##pq\geq (p(x+1)/p(x))^2##. So we see that
(p(x+1)/p(x))^2\leq pq\leq p(x)-2i &lt; (p(x+1)/p(x))^2
which is a contradiction.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top