Find all divisors of for example 29601

  • Thread starter Thread starter symplectic_manifold
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example
symplectic_manifold
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
A question:
If I want to find all divisors of for example 29601 and in general all divisors of any (large) number, do I have to do it "on foot" i.e. with help of the division rules or checking each number looking if it divides the given number?...As far as I know there is no unified algorithm for computing the divisors of any number...or am I wrong? Does there exist such an algorithm? Computing divisors of small numbers is clearly a cheap task but I find it extremely tedious for large numbers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There exist algorithms (though still "tedious") for factoring numbers. Finding all divisors would then be a matter of partitioning the set of all prime factors. (But every partition gives you two divisors!)
 
"...An ordered factorization of the positive integer n into exactly l factors is an l-tuple (d_1, . . . , d_l) such that n = d_1 · · · d_l. The divisor function d(n)
counts the number of ordered factorizations of n into exactly two factors,
since each factorization n = dd' is completely determined by the first factor
d. For every positive integer l, we define the arithmetic function d_l(n)
the number of factorizations of n into exactly l factors. Then d_1(n) = 1
and d_2(n) = d(n) for all n..."

did you mean this?...I could barely understand anything however...it has something to do with multiplicative functions...it says.

Could you tell please me more about the term "partitioning of the set of prime numbers" and why every partition gives us two divisors? :smile:
 
Find prime factorization, e.g. 60=2^{2}3^{1}5^{1}. Any divisor will be of the form 3=2^a3^b5^c where 0<=a<=2, 0<=b<=1, 0<=c<=1, e.g 2^03^15^0. This corresponds to another divisor, 60/3=20=2^23^05^1, and if you like you can think of this as a partition of the primes {2,2,3,5} into two 'multi'sets {3}, and {2,2,5}.

wherever that passage you quoted came from, it looks like they talk about the plain old divisor function d(n) earlier. Have a look at that section if possible.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top