Find Derivative of f(z) Where z = a+ib

  • Thread starter Thread starter 8daysAweek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
8daysAweek
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Find all points where the function has a derivative. At which of these points the function is analytical.<br /> <br /> f(z) = \left\{<br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> {z^2}sin(\frac{1}{|z^2|}) &amp; z \neq 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; z = 0}<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right.<br /> <br />

I have tried deriving directly using the limit and also tried using Cauchy-Riemann, both tries led to complicated formulas.

For example Cauchy-Riemann approach:
<br /> f(a+ib) = \underbrace{ (a^2-b^2)sin(1/\sqrt{a^2+b^2})}_{u} +<br /> i\underbrace{{2ab}\cdot{sin(1/\sqrt{a^2+b^2})}}_{v}<br />
Now I need to calculate dv/da ,du/da ,dv/db,du/db, but this seems like a headache.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you have square roots over the a^2 + b^2 expressions? Isn't there a |z^2| = |z|^2 = a^2 + b^2 term in the original function?

Also taking partial derivatives is easy. Just check the Cauchy-Riemann equations for z = a + ib =/= 0. At the origin, you'll probably have to resort to the definition anyways. You might already know the answer at least for the origin since there is a real-valued function that is similarly defined and often used as a counterexample.
 
snipez90 said:
Why do you have square roots over the a^2 + b^2 expressions? Isn't there a |z^2| = |z|^2 = a^2 + b^2 term in the original function?

Also taking partial derivatives is easy. Just check the Cauchy-Riemann equations for z = a + ib =/= 0. At the origin, you'll probably have to resort to the definition anyways. You might already know the answer at least for the origin since there is a real-valued function that is similarly defined and often used as a counterexample.

Yes, my mistake, it should be a^2+b^2 without the root.
But, still it does not make finding partial derivatives simple. For example, here is du/da calculated by WolframAlpha:
attachment.php?attachmentid=27559&stc=1&d=1281804936.png


Can you explain the real-valued function method? How do you use it as a counter example?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    1.7 KB · Views: 456
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top