Find effective resistance using kirchoff's laws

  • Thread starter Thread starter brushman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Resistance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the effective resistance between specific nodes in a circuit using Kirchhoff's laws. Participants express confusion about determining current directions and the relationship between multiple currents in the circuit, noting that there are more unknowns than equations. They suggest simplifying the problem by reducing the number of independent currents and using a reference node for analysis. Additionally, the importance of setting up equations based on the circuit's configuration is emphasized, with a focus on the relationship between the effective resistance and the currents. Ultimately, the solution hinges on correctly applying Kirchhoff's laws to derive the effective resistance.
brushman
Messages
112
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Find the effective resistance between the circled nodes in the following network (use a computer to solve the system of equations you get). Note that bump in the crossing wires meaning they're not connected.

Homework Equations


Sum of currents at a node is 0. Sum of voltages around a closed loop is 0.

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know how to tell if currents are the same by symmetry, so as far as I can tell there's 5 different currents I1, I2, I3, I4, and I5. But I only see 2 nodes to create current equations with, leaving me with 3 more unknowns. I would guess that the current through the R1 resistors are the equal, and the current through the R2 resistors are equal, but I don't know how to tell the direction the current would be flowing.

Secondly, I only see 3 loops, one of them being a figure 8. So basically I can make 5 equations, but I have 7 unknowns.
 

Attachments

  • circuit.png
    circuit.png
    14.9 KB · Views: 553
Physics news on Phys.org
There are really only three independent currents, the other currents can be made up of combinations of those three thanks to KCL at the junctions. When currents split off at a junction, try to create as few new currents as you can. For example, suppose a current I1 flows into a junction and two paths leave the junction. Label one departing current as I2, and the other as I1 - I2. Then only one new current is created at the split. When currents meet at a junction, sum already known incoming currents to determine the outgoing current whenever possible.

Three currents, three loops, no problem.

if you're looking to write node equations, then if you put a current source driving the input and ground the lower input terminal (reference node), I can see three nodes (including the top input terminal).
 
brushman said:

Homework Statement


Find the effective resistance between the circled nodes in the following network (use a computer to solve the system of equations you get). Note that bump in the crossing wires meaning they're not connected.


Homework Equations


Sum of currents at a node is 0. Sum of voltages around a closed loop is 0.


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know how to tell if currents are the same by symmetry, so as far as I can tell there's 5 different currents I1, I2, I3, I4, and I5. But I only see 2 nodes to create current equations with, leaving me with 3 more unknowns. I would guess that the current through the R1 resistors are the equal, and the current through the R2 resistors are equal, but I don't know how to tell the direction the current would be flowing.

Secondly, I only see 3 loops, one of them being a figure 8. So basically I can make 5 equations, but I have 7 unknowns.

To find the effective resistance between A and B, imagine a battery with emf E connected between these points and find the current I1 flowing through this battery. You can also redraw the circuit so as easier to follow the six currents and three loops. There are enough equations!

ehild
 

Attachments

  • crossres.JPG
    crossres.JPG
    25.1 KB · Views: 516
Thanks. So to finish the problem I need to set up my equations and solve for I1, the current going through the imaginary voltage source. Then with the simplified circuit consisting of my Emf, Ref, and I1, I can solve for Ref in terms of I1 and Emf (where I1 is in terms of R1, R2, and R3). Is that correct? So my answer depends on what voltage source you attach? That doesn't seem right.

edit: nevermind, it looks like you can solve for Emf in terms of Rs and Is
 
But I1 will be proportional to E, so E cancels.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top