Find f(x) from 1.22, 2.25, 3.24: How to Calculate

  • Thread starter Thread starter burochokkotti
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a function f(x) that fits the points f(1) = 1.22, f(2) = 2.25, and f(3) = 3.24. A suggested solution is a quadratic function, specifically f(x) = -0.02x² + 1.09x + 0.15, which passes through the given points. However, it's noted that there are infinitely many possible functions that could fit these values. Participants are encouraged to explore and create their own valid functions based on the data provided. The conversation highlights the flexibility and creativity involved in mathematical problem-solving.
burochokkotti
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Can anybody tell me the relation between this numbers? I mean, say there's f(x) = 1.22 at x=1, f(x)= 2.25 at x=2 and so on..I need to know f(x).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's hard to say without knowing more terms. If you need any function that passes through those three points you could use the quadratic f(x) = -0.02x2 + 1.09x + 0.15.
 
Last edited:
burochokkotti said:
Can anybody tell me the relation between this numbers? I mean, say there's f(x) = 1.22 at x=1, f(x)= 2.25 at x=2 and so on..I need to know f(x).
There are innumerably many correct answers as to what f(x) might be.

Which one do you want?

Edit:
Make your own correct answer! :smile:
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top