Find grams of product using a balanced chemical equation

AI Thread Summary
The balanced chemical equation shows that 2 moles of potassium chlorate (KClO3) decompose to produce 2 moles of potassium chloride (KCl) and 3 moles of oxygen (O2). To find the grams of potassium chloride produced from 25 g of potassium chlorate, the calculation involves converting grams of KClO3 to moles, then using the stoichiometric ratio to find moles of KCl produced, and finally converting back to grams. The correct calculation yields approximately 15.2 g of KCl, confirming the final result is accurate despite missing a crucial stoichiometric conversion factor. The stoichiometry indicates that 2 moles of KCl are produced for every 2 moles of KClO3 decomposed, which simplifies to a 1:1 ratio.
trivk96
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2KClO3 → 2KCl + 3O2

How many grams of potassium chloride are produced if 25 g of potassium chlorate decompose


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



25g * (1 mole KClO3/122.45 g KClO3) *(74.45g/ 1 mole KCl) =15.2 g KCl

is this right??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Final result is OK, although you are missing a conversion factor, one that is crucial for the stoichiometry - 2 moles KCl produced per each 2 moles of KClO3 decomposed. Luckily to you 2/2 is just 1.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top