Find λ for Non-Uniform Scale & Shear Transformation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the eigenvalues λ for the matrix representing a non-uniform scale and shear transformation. The matrix provided is A = [[4, 3], [1, 2]], and the task is to solve the equation A * [u, 1] = λ * [u, 1]. It is established that the two eigenvalues are 5 and 1, which can be derived from the equations obtained by multiplying the matrix and eliminating λ. The second part of the question involves determining the invariant lines through the origin, which depend on the values of u derived from the first part. Understanding the relationship between u and λ is crucial for solving both parts of the problem.
Appleton
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the two numerical values of λ such that

<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}4&amp;3\\1&amp;2\end{array}\right)<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}u\\1\end{array}\right)<br /> =λ<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}u\\1\end{array}\right)<br />

Hence or otherwise find the equations of the two lines through the origin which are invariant under the transformation of the plane defined by

<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}x\prime\\y\prime\end{array}\right)<br /> =<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}4&amp;3\\1&amp;2\end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}x\\y\end{array}\right)<br />

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe <br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}4&amp;3\\1&amp;2\end{array}\right)<br /> represents a non uniform scale and shear. If λ is a numerical value it can only scale uniformly which suggests there is no solution to the initial equation. However, my textbook tells me the 2 numerical values are 5 and 1.

I skipped this first part of the question and found the two invariant lines by setting y=mx+c equal to y\prime=mx\prime+c. If someone could help me understand the first part of the question I would be very appreciative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi App,

Can you write out the two equations that follow from the first matrix multiplication ? Eliminating ##\lambda## first seems the easiest to me; then the two values for u give the book values for ##\lambda##.
 
Appleton said:

Homework Statement


Find the two numerical values of λ such that

<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}4&amp;3\\1&amp;2\end{array}\right)<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}u\\1\end{array}\right)<br /> =λ<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}u\\1\end{array}\right)<br />

Hence or otherwise find the equations of the two lines through the origin which are invariant under the transformation of the plane defined by

<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}x\prime\\y\prime\end{array}\right)<br /> =<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}4&amp;3\\1&amp;2\end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}x\\y\end{array}\right)<br />

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe <br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}4&amp;3\\1&amp;2\end{array}\right)<br /> represents a non uniform scale and shear. If λ is a numerical value it can only scale uniformly which suggests there is no solution to the initial equation. However, my textbook tells me the 2 numerical values are 5 and 1.

I skipped this first part of the question and found the two invariant lines by setting y=mx+c equal to y\prime=mx\prime+c. If someone could help me understand the first part of the question I would be very appreciative.

The question is asking you to find the eigenvalues ##\lambda_1, \lambda_2## of the matrix
A =\pmatrix{4&amp;3\\1&amp;2}
and to show that the eigenvectors of ##A## have the form
\pmatrix{u\\1}
See, eg., http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/LA_Eigen.aspx .
 
The equation \begin{pmatrix}4 &amp; 3 \\ 1 &amp; 2 \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} u \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}= \lambda\begin{pmatrix} u \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} is the same as the two equations 4u+ 3= \lambda u and u+ 2= \lambda. That second equation is the same as u= \lambda- 2. Replace u in the first equation with \lambda- 2 to get an equation in \lambda.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the help. I guess I wasn't taking into account the fact that u is not constant.

I am still having difficulty understanding how the 2nd part of the question follows from the first. My book has not yet explicitly introduced me to eigenvectors, so I am presuming that the connection can be deduced from very rudimentary matrix principles.
 
Appleton said:
Thanks for the help. I guess I wasn't taking into account the fact that u is not constant.

I am still having difficulty understanding how the 2nd part of the question follows from the first. My book has not yet explicitly introduced me to eigenvectors, so I am presuming that the connection can be deduced from very rudimentary matrix principles.

In fact, u is a constant---it is just the case that you don't know its value yet. Ditto for ##\lambda##.

Basically, you just need to write down the two equations in ##u## that you get from rows 1 and 2 of your matrix; then you have two equations in the single unknown ##u##. (The equations have an undetermined parameter ##\lambda## in them.) In order for these two equations to be consistent, the value (or values) of ##\lambda## must be special, and figuring out these special values is the crux of your problem.
 
Appleton said:
Thanks for the help. I guess I wasn't taking into account the fact that u is not constant.

I am still having difficulty understanding how the 2nd part of the question follows from the first. My book has not yet explicitly introduced me to eigenvectors, so I am presuming that the connection can be deduced from very rudimentary matrix principles.
Yes, it can, which should reinforce what an eigenvector is when it is formally defined.
 
I think I get it now. So the value of λ is superfluous for the second part of the question, it is only really u that we are concerned with at this stage, since u defines the vectors which, when multiplied by λ define the 2 invariant lines through the origin.

Thanks for all your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top