MHB Find Lowest Value for A: a1, a2, a3 & 4 | Arithmetic Progression

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the lowest value of A = a1a2 + a2a3 + a3a1 for an arithmetic progression defined by a1, a2, a3, and 4. A participant expresses uncertainty about their approach, having derived A = 3x^2 + 6xd + 2d^2. Another user suggests that the fourth term of the progression can simplify A into a single variable, which would facilitate finding the minimum value. The original poster acknowledges the oversight and appreciates the guidance provided. The conversation emphasizes the importance of utilizing all given terms in mathematical problems for simplification.
mitaka90
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
a1, a2, a3 and 4 make an arithmetic progression with difference d. For which values of d, A = a1a2 + a2a3 + a3a1 has the lowest value?I don't know if I went with the right approach, but I managed to get this : A=3x2 +6xd + 2d2 for a1= x, a2 = x + d, etc... But I don't know what else to do.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mitaka90 said:
a1, a2, a3 and 4 make an arithmetic progression with difference d. For which values of d, A = a1a2 + a2a3 + a3a1 has the lowest value?I don't know if I went with the right approach, but I managed to get this : A=3x2 +6xd + 2d2 for a1= x, a2 = x + d, etc... But I don't know what else to do.
Hi mitaka90!

It seems to me you haven't made good use of the given fourth term in that arithmetic progression...:) the fourth term would help you to simplify your $A$ in terms of only one variable and when you have the quadratic equation in terms of one variable, I believe you could handle from there...
 
anemone said:
Hi mitaka90!

It seems to me you haven't made good use of the given fourth term in that arithmetic progression...:) the fourth term would help you to simplify your $A$ in terms of only one variable and when you have the quadratic equation in terms of one variable, I believe you could handle from there...

Omg, I'm such a moron. I hate it when I do the hard work and then the easiest and most noticable thing just slips from my sight. Thank you sincerely, I guess that little tip is what I needed.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top