Find out how a nuclear plant works

AI Thread Summary
Nuclear plants operate through a process called fission, where Uranium-235 nuclei split, releasing energy and neutrons. The reaction can start spontaneously due to the presence of stray neutrons, but a critical mass of U-235 is necessary to sustain a chain reaction. Control rods are used to manage the reaction rate by absorbing or allowing neutrons to pass, maintaining the system just above critical mass. Even after control rods are deployed, the reaction can continue producing heat, necessitating effective cooling systems to prevent damage. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for safe nuclear reactor operation.
expertnot
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am not a science guy, but I have been trying to find out how a nuclear plant works and I think I get it; however, I am not clear what it means to bombard something with neutrons.

I think I understand how the process continues due to the chain reaaction, but how do you start the reaction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


There are enough neutrons around. For example, occasionally an atom will undergo fission spontaneously. For weapons a trigger is used, i.e. a neutron source.
 


What do they mean when they say they are bombarding the fuel with neurtons? What makes the reaction start?
 


expertnot said:
What do they mean when they say they are bombarding the fuel with neurtons? What makes the reaction start?
There are always stray neutrons around in a reactor. It will start by itself as a result.
 


You don't need to 'supply' neutrons. The nuclei of the Uranium 235 in the reactor are continually breaking down at random and spontaneously, at a low rate. This produces fast neutrons. If a fast neutron hits another U235 nucleus it will cause it to split and produce more neutrons. If these all hit other nuclei and all of these hit more nuclei, you have a chain reaction. If the Uranium has too little U235, the process won't take off because most of the neutrons will slow down and become harmless before they have hit U235 nuclei. You need sufficient Mass (the critical mass) of U235 in a sufficiently small space (i.e. high enough purity Uranium) for this to happen. With not enough, too many neutrons get lost around the edges.
The secret, in a reactor, is to arrange for the situation to be just above critical so that there are enough neutrons produced to keep the process going. This is done by having the fuel rods spaced in regular rows and to raise and lower 'control rods' which can absorb the neutrons or let them through to control the rate of the reaction and get it just as you want it.
The problem is that you can't stop this reaction very quickly. Even when you drop in the control rods there is still a lot going on in there and heat is still being produced. The reactors, in Japan, were shut down as soon as needed, I believe, but then other problems meant that there wasn't enough water available to cool everything down. This produced damage and even more problems etc. etc..
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top