Find percentage of a sample given the mean and standard deviation

maiad
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


People drink on average, 78L of beer per year with a standard deviation of 25L. at least what percentage of people would drink between 20 and 136L per year?

The Attempt at a Solution



I found the z-scores of both and they came up to be +/- 2.32. Compared these values to the z-table and got P(Z<2.32)=0.0102 and P(Z<2.32)=0.9898. Then i found the percentage as followed... 0.9898-0.0102 which is around 98%. Which is wrong. Is my assumption that the graph is symmetrical correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
maiad said:

Homework Statement


People drink on average, 78L of beer per year with a standard deviation of 25L. at least what percentage of people would drink between 20 and 136L per year?

The Attempt at a Solution



I found the z-scores of both and they came up to be +/- 2.32. Compared these values to the z-table and got P(-2.32<Z)=0.0102 and P(Z<2.32)=0.9898. Then i found the percentage as followed... 0.9898-0.0102 which is around 97%. Which is wrong. Is my assumption that the graph is symmetrical correct?

Sure, this is implicitly given to be a normal distribution, which is symmetrical.

First of all, your left-tail probability makes no sense as you wrote it. Shouldn't it be ##p(z<-2.32) = 0.0102##?

When you subtract those two, the answer isn't "around 97%", it's a lot closer to 98%. Did you try being a lot more precise with your answer?

Because of the symmetry, you could just as easily have taken ##p(-2.32<z<2.32) = 1 - 2\times 0.0102##.
 
Curious3141 said:
Sure, this is implicitly given to be a normal distribution, which is symmetrical.

First of all, your left-tail probability makes no sense as you wrote it. Shouldn't it be ##p(z<-2.32) = 0.0102##?

When you subtract those two, the answer isn't "around 97%", it's a lot closer to 98%. Did you try being a lot more precise with your answer?

Because of the symmetry, you could just as easily have taken ##p(-2.32<z<2.32) = 1 - 2\times 0.0102##.

You're correct. The left tail is wrong as you stated. But even with more precision in my numbers, it's still a fair bit off from the actual answer which is 81.40%
 
I wouldn't implicitly consider it normal unless stated. Anyway, one can exploit some of available probabilistic inequalities. Since the Chebyshev's inequality is usually taught, try this one, maiad. Most likely, you will succeed to get your "correct" value :-)
 
camillio said:
I wouldn't implicitly consider it normal unless stated. Anyway, one can exploit some of available probabilistic inequalities. Since the Chebyshev's inequality is usually taught, try this one, maiad. Most likely, you will succeed to get your "correct" value :-)

That actually does work out to the expected answer. And I think you're quite correct - considering the phrase "at least" in the question, they aren't expecting any assumption about the underlying distribution.

Maiad - please take Camillio's advice, Chebyshev's inequality seems to be what's expected.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top