A Find Reduced Mass for Polyatomic Molecules

Iceking20
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
How could we find the reduced mass for polyatomic molecule ?
Summary: How could we find the reduced mass for polyatomic molecule ?

I have problem with reduced mass of poly atomic moleculs because for diatomic molecules you can easily find out the reduced mass by M¹M²/M¹+M²,but I don't think with this way we can find reduces mass for example for fe²o³?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That will depend on the vibration mode and in general there won't be a single answer, you can't use the effective mass for everything.

I moved this thread to the quantum mechanics forum.
 
  • Like
Likes Iceking20
mfb said:
That will depend on the vibration mode and in general there won't be a single answer, you can't use the effective mass for everything.

I moved this thread to the quantum mechanics forum.
Can you give an example for one of the modes because I want to have perspective about it
 
Iceking20 said:
Summary: How could we find the reduced mass for polyatomic molecule ?

Summary: How could we find the reduced mass for polyatomic molecule ?

I have problem with reduced mass of poly atomic moleculs because for diatomic molecules you can easily find out the reduced mass by M¹M²/M¹+M²,but I don't think with this way we can find reduces mass for example for fe²o³?
In general, the inverse reduced mass is the sum of the inverse masses of the constituents. For 2 constituents one gets your formula.

However, the concept of a reduced mass is indeed most useful for the case of 2 constituents only, where the center of mass frame leaves a 1-particle problem with the reduced mass.

For more than 2 constituents, no such simple recipe works, and the reduced Hamiltonian depends on the way relative coordinates are chosen.
 
  • Like
Likes Iceking20
Iceking20 said:
Can you give an example for one of the modes because I want to have perspective about it
Everything. Even if we take a molecule with three atoms in a straight, symmetric line it will have vibrations along that line (contraction/extension) and vibrations orthogonal to it (making it slightly "L"-shaped). In the first case only the outer atoms move, in the second case all atoms move.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top