Find speed with tension, mass given. thanks

AI Thread Summary
A 33 kg child on a swing experiences a tension of 259 N in each chain at the lowest point. To find the child's speed, the equation for centripetal force must include gravitational force, leading to the formula v = sqrt[(2T - mg)r]/m. The correct calculation yields a speed of approximately 4.67 m/s. For the force of the seat on the child, the normal force equals the sum of the gravitational force and the centripetal force acting on the child. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly accounting for all forces in circular motion problems.
MissPenguins
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


009 (part 1 of 2) 10.0 points
A 33 kg child sits in a swing supported by two chains, each 3.7 m long. If the tension in each chain at the lowest point is 259 N, find the child’s speed at the lowest point. (Neglect the mass of the seat.) Answer in unit m/s.
b. Find the force of the seat on the child at the
lowest point. Answer in unit N


Homework Equations


F = mv2/r


The Attempt at a Solution


Rearrange equation, and I got sqrt(Fr/m) = sqrt(259N * 3.7m)/33 kg) = 5.3888...
I got it wrong. What did I do wrong? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MissPenguins said:

Homework Statement


009 (part 1 of 2) 10.0 points
A 33 kg child sits in a swing supported by two chains, each 3.7 m long. If the tension in each chain at the lowest point is 259 N, find the child’s speed at the lowest point. (Neglect the mass of the seat.) Answer in unit m/s.
b. Find the force of the seat on the child at the
lowest point. Answer in unit N


Homework Equations


F = mv2/r


The Attempt at a Solution


Rearrange equation, and I got sqrt(Fr/m) = sqrt(259N * 3.7m)/33 kg) = 5.3888...
I got it wrong. What did I do wrong? Thanks.


Good Evening Miss Penguins,

You're correct that this is a circular motion problem, but you neglected some of the forces. First you need to draw a picture, and determine the free body diagram for the isolated child.

The isolated child experiences a gravitational attraction, or weight, and a contact force from the seat, the normal force N. Here's a picture to get you started:

http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/6937/swingw.jpg

Hint: The normal force N has a magnitude of 2 times the tension, since the seat is massless.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know if this is the same as already suggested, but my thought is that the forces add up to the centripetal force:
Fc = 2T - mg
 
dr_k said:
Good Evening Miss Penguins,

You're correct that this is a circular motion problem, but you neglected some of the forces. First you need to draw a picture, and determine the free body diagram for the isolated child.

The isolated child experiences a gravitational attraction, or weight, and a contact force from the seat, the normal force N. Here's a picture to get you started:

http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/6937/swingw.jpg

Hint: The normal force N has a magnitude of 2 times the tension, since the seat is massless.

so I used the wrong equation for it? Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Delphi51 said:
I don't know if this is the same as already suggested, but my thought is that the forces add up to the centripetal force:
Fc = 2T - mg

I don't know, but for the first answer, they are asking for speed though, and the equation u suggested doesn't have speed.
 
You will of course replace Fc with mv²/R as you did in the first go.
The difference is that mg is involved.
 
Delphi51 said:
You will of course replace Fc with mv²/R as you did in the first go.
The difference is that mg is involved.

I rearranged the equation and ended up with v = sqrt [(2T-mg)r]/m = sqrt [(2(259 N) - (33kg)(9.8m/s2))(3.7)] / (33 kg) = 21.818787...
Does that look reasonable?
 
MissPenguins said:
I rearranged the equation and ended up with v = sqrt [(2T-mg)r]/m = sqrt [(2(259 N) - (33kg)(9.8m/s2))(3.7)] / (33 kg) = 21.818787...
Does that look reasonable?

That m should be inside the square root, I believe.
 
dr_k said:
That m should be inside the square root, I believe.

Yeah it is inside. I submitted the answer, and it is wrong. :(
 
  • #10
MissPenguins said:
Yeah it is inside. I submitted the answer, and it is wrong. :(


It doesn't look that way, according to the equation you wrote.

Can you prove that the magnitude of the Normal force is equal to twice the tension?
 
  • #11
dr_k said:
It doesn't look that way, according to the equation you wrote.

Can you prove that the magnitude of the Normal force is equal to twice the tension?

What do you mean by it doesn't look that way? lol...well, I put it in the calculator that way. So v = sqrt of [((2T-mg)r) / m] = sqrt of [((2(259 N)-(33kg)(9.8m/s2)(3.7m) / 33 kg] = 21.8187878787 WRONG. :(
 
  • #12
MissPenguins said:
What do you mean by it doesn't look that way? lol...well, I put it in the calculator that way. So v = sqrt of [((2T-mg)r) / m] = sqrt of [((2(259 N)-(33kg)(9.8m/s2)(3.7m) / 33 kg] = 21.8187878787 WRONG. :(

Alright, I was able to get a right thanks to a friend. I use ((259*2) - (33)(9.8)) = 194.6, and then v = sqrt of (Fr/m) => sqrt of ((194.6)(3.7)/33 = 4.671058539.



Then in part 2, it says find the force of the seat on the child at the lowest point. I have no clue how to do it. :( Please help, thanks.
 
  • #13
Two ways to look at part 2.
First, there is no mass other than the child so the tension forces are entirely applied to the child via the seat.
Second, apply "sum of Forces = ma" to the child. The only forces are gravity and the seat force.
 
  • #14
Delphi51 said:
Two ways to look at part 2.
First, there is no mass other than the child so the tension forces are entirely applied to the child via the seat.
Second, apply "sum of Forces = ma" to the child. The only forces are gravity and the seat force.

Nvm, I got it, thanks a lot anyway. :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top