Find the acceleration of a race car traveling up a curve

AI Thread Summary
A 500 kg race car starts from rest on a curve with a radius of 50 m and travels 20 degrees in 4 seconds, requiring the calculation of its total acceleration. The initial calculations for angular velocity and tangential acceleration were incorrect due to the use of average values instead of instantaneous values for uniformly accelerated motion. The correct approach involves recalculating the angular acceleration and using it to find the tangential and centripetal accelerations, which are vectors and must be combined using vector addition. The final total acceleration should be recalculated to reflect these corrections, with an expected outcome of around 1.15 m/s². Accurate calculations are essential for determining the race car's performance on the curve.
Rubber Band
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 500 kg race car starts at rest on a curve with a radius of 50 m. If it goes 20 degrees in 4 seconds with a constant angular acceleration, what is its total acceleration at the end of this time?

m=500kg
r = 50 m
angle = pi/9 radians
time = 4 seconds

The Attempt at a Solution



angular velocity=∆radians/∆time
angular accel=angular velocity/time
tangential accel=radius*angular accel
centripetal accel=angular velocity^2*r

angular velocity=(pi/9)/4 seconds = 0.0873 radians/second
angular accel=(0.0873 radians/second)/4 seconds = 0.0218 radians/second^2
tangential accel=(50m)(0.0218 radians/second^2)=1.09 m/s^2
centripetal accel=(0.0873 radians/second)^2(50 m) = 1.52 X 10^-4 m/s^2

TOTAL ACCELERATION = tangential acceleration + centripetal acceleration = 1.09 m/s^2 + 1.52 X 10^-4 m/s^2 = 1.09 m/s^2

I have a feeling I didn't do this right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rubber Band said:

Homework Statement


A 500 kg race car starts at rest on a curve with a radius of 50 m. If it goes 20 degrees in 4 seconds with a constant angular acceleration, what is its total acceleration at the end of this time?

m=500kg
r = 50 m
angle = pi/9 radians
time = 4 seconds

The Attempt at a Solution



angular velocity=∆radians/∆time
angular accel=angular velocity/time
tangential accel=radius*angular accel
centripetal accel=angular velocity^2*r

angular velocity=(pi/9)/4 seconds = 0.0873 radians/second
angular accel=(0.0873 radians/second)/4 seconds = 0.0218 radians/second^2
tangential accel=(50m)(0.0218 radians/second^2)=1.09 m/s^2
centripetal accel=(0.0873 radians/second)^2(50 m) = 1.52 X 10^-4 m/s^2

TOTAL ACCELERATION = tangential acceleration + centripetal acceleration = 1.09 m/s^2 + 1.52 X 10^-4 m/s^2 = 1.09 m/s^2

I have a feeling I didn't do this right...
Almost perfect. The tangential and centripetal accelerations are correct, But they are vectors acting at right angles to each other, so you can't just add them algebraically. Instead, you must______?

Edit: Except you also have a math error in your centripetal acceleration equation. Not quite almost perfect.
 
Last edited:
sqrt(1.09^2 + 0.000152^2) = 1.09 m/s^2

That's the same acceleration I got before. Is it correct?
 
Rubber Band said:
sqrt(1.09^2 + 0.000152^2) = 1.09 m/s^2

That's the same acceleration I got before. Is it correct?
correct your math error for centripetal acceleration, then it should be correct, unless i, too, have made a math error. It comes out to 0.38m/s^2, and I get the total acceleration equal to 1.15m/s^2.
 
The tangential acceleration is not quite correct. Imagine a car that started from rest and traveled 20 metres in 4 seconds. How would you calculate its linear acceleration? The angular acceleration must be calculated the same way.
 
naresh said:
The tangential acceleration is not quite correct. Imagine a car that started from rest and traveled 20 metres in 4 seconds. How would you calculate its linear acceleration? The angular acceleration must be calculated the same way.
It's 20 degrees in 4 seconds, not 20 meters.
 
PhanthomJay said:
It's 20 degrees in 4 seconds, not 20 meters.

Yes, I realize that. I was trying to draw an analogy, admittedly I wasn't too successful at that.

Let me try again.

Angular velocity = {Change in angle}/{change in time} is not correct for uniformly accelerated angular motion. The way you work this out is the same as the way you work with uniformly accelerated linear motion.
 
naresh said:
Yes, I realize that. I was trying to draw an analogy, admittedly I wasn't too successful at that.

Let me try again.

Angular velocity = {Change in angle}/{change in time} is not correct for uniformly accelerated angular motion. The way you work this out is the same as the way you work with uniformly accelerated linear motion.
Oh, yes, sorry, you are correct. What has been calculated is the average angular velocity. What is needed is the instantaneous angular velocity. Good catch, thanks. That'll change all the numbers.
 
What is the correct formula? I have this on a test review, and have no idea what I am doing.
 
Back
Top