Find the Acute Angle Formed by Line y-(sqrt(3))x+1=0 & x-Axis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Agent_J
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the acute angle formed by the line y - (sqrt(3))x + 1 = 0 and the x-axis. The line can be simplified to y = sqrt(3)x, making it easier to analyze. A point on the line is determined to be (sqrt(3), 3), forming a right triangle with the x-axis. The tangent of the angle is calculated as tan(t) = 3/sqrt(3), leading to an angle of 60 degrees or pi/3 radians. The gradient of the line directly correlates to the tangent of the angle with the x-axis, confirming the solution's validity.
Agent_J
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Find the acute angle that is formed by the line y - (sqrt(3)) x + 1 = 0 and the x-axis.

better picture here:
http://members.rogers.com/agentj/images/math.jpg

I am totally lost with this one. It was from my old trigonometry test, but I don't see the relavance of the question to trigonometry :frown:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
you know the gradient and that's tan of the angle you want
 
so how would I start tackling this question :redface: ?
 
What this is basically is polar coordinates.

We solve for y, and get y = sqrt(3) - 1. It's easier to do if the graph intersects the origin. Because this is just a straight line, the -1 can be removed from the equation and it won't change the angle to the x-axis. So, our equation is...

y = sqrt(3)x

Next, we need to get a point. Just to keep nice even answers, I'll use x = sqrt(3).

y = sqrt(3)x
y = sqrt(3)*sqrt(3)
y = 3

So, a point is (sqrt(3), 3).

Now, what you do is basically, it makes a triangle. The base (x) is sqrt(3), and the height (y) is 3.

We use our SOH-CAH-TOA trig functions, and see that tan = opp/adj. The opposite angle is the height/y, and the adjacent angle is the base/x.

I'm just using the letter t for now to make things easier...

tan t = 3/sqrt(3)
t = arctan(3/sqrt(3))

t = 60 degrees, or pi/3 if you're working in radians

NOTE: I always seem to goof something up whenever I try to help here, so someone else should just double check what I did.
 
apart from the fact that you made it far more complicated than it needs to be, that is correct.

y=mx+c

then the gradient is m and that is tan of the angle of the slope, that's all.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top