Find the angular acceleration of the rod

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular acceleration of a rod released from a 30-degree angle with a weight of 25 lb and a length of 6 ft. Participants debate the correct radius to use for the vertical component of acceleration, with suggestions that the center of mass should be considered at half the rod's length. There is confusion about setting the horizontal net force to zero, as the center of gravity moves when the rod falls. Clarifications are made regarding the initial conditions, emphasizing that the rod starts from rest and has no initial angular velocity. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the motion of the center of mass and the dynamics involved in the rod's release.
lion_
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given: ##\mu_B=0.52##

##\theta=30^{\circ}##

Weight- ##25## lb

##\omega=0##

## l=6## ft

##r_c=3\sqrt 2## radius of curvature.

Homework Equations


My Equations of motion are the following:

##\xleftarrow{+}\sum F_x=N_A\sin 60 - F_B=0##

##\downarrow{+} \sum F_y= N_A \cos 60-N_B+mg=m(a_G)_y##

##\circlearrowright + \sum M_G=2.60N_B-1.5F_B+2.60N_A\cos 60=I_G \alpha##

##(a_G)_y=\alpha r##

##I_G=\frac{1}{12}ml^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure what ##r## to use for my ##(a_g)_Y## value
I have tried multipule values of ##r## such as 6,3 and ##r_c## none yield the correct answer.
 

Attachments

  • Hibbeler14.ch17.p102a.jpg
    Hibbeler14.ch17.p102a.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 588
Physics news on Phys.org
Why have you set the horizontal net force equal to zero in your first equation? As the rod falls, won't its centre of gravity move? For instance, the final centre of gravity will be further right than the centre of gravity when the rod's pivoting collar was at the very top of the quarter circle pipe.

Are you using ##a_G## to refer to the acceleration of the rod's centre of mass and ##(a_G)_y## to refer to the vertical component of that acceleration? If so, won't you just have ##(a_G)_y=\frac{l\alpha\cos\theta}{2}##, since the centre of mass is at radius ##\frac{l}{2}## from the (moving) point on the ground about which the rod is rotating?
 
andrewkirk said:
Why have you set the horizontal net force equal to zero in your first equation? As the rod falls, won't its centre of gravity move? For instance, the final centre of gravity will be further right than the centre of gravity when the rod's pivoting collar was at the very top of the quarter circle pipe.

Are you using ##a_G## to refer to the acceleration of the rod's centre of mass and ##(a_G)_y## to refer to the vertical component of that acceleration? If so, won't you just have ##(a_G)_y=\frac{l\alpha\cos\theta}{2}##, since the centre of mass is at radius ##\frac{l}{2}## from the (moving) point on the ground about which the rod is rotating?

Let me make this a little bit clearer the rod is released from rest at 30 degrees. Now I don't have to worry about horizontal motion.
 
The initial horizontal velocity of the CoM being zero does not entail that the horizontal accel of the CoM is zero.

Further, if we take the centre of the quarter circle as the origin, then the x coordinate of the CoM of the rod is initially ##3\cdot(1-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2})\approx 0.4##, whereas once the rod has fallen flat the x coordinate will be ##3\cdot(\sqrt{2}-1)\approx 1.2##. So the CoM must move horizontally.
 
But at the instant theta is 30 degrees it is released from rest. So imagine a hand holding the rod and as soon as it is released the rod has no initial angular velocity. The normal component of the acceleration is obviously 0 at that instant but there is tangential acceleration of the rod.
 
The picture you see is the rod being released from rest at that angle.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K