Find the angular acceleration of the rod

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the angular acceleration of a rod released from a specific angle in a physics context. The problem involves concepts from dynamics and rotational motion, including forces acting on the rod, its center of mass, and angular motion equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of setting horizontal net forces to zero and question the assumptions regarding the movement of the center of mass as the rod falls. There are discussions about the correct interpretation of acceleration components and the role of the radius in the equations of motion.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing clarifications and questioning the original poster's assumptions. There is no explicit consensus yet, as various interpretations of the motion and forces are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the rod is released from rest at an angle of 30 degrees, and there are considerations regarding the initial conditions and the movement of the center of mass during the motion.

lion_
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given: ##\mu_B=0.52##

##\theta=30^{\circ}##

Weight- ##25## lb

##\omega=0##

## l=6## ft

##r_c=3\sqrt 2## radius of curvature.

Homework Equations


My Equations of motion are the following:

##\xleftarrow{+}\sum F_x=N_A\sin 60 - F_B=0##

##\downarrow{+} \sum F_y= N_A \cos 60-N_B+mg=m(a_G)_y##

##\circlearrowright + \sum M_G=2.60N_B-1.5F_B+2.60N_A\cos 60=I_G \alpha##

##(a_G)_y=\alpha r##

##I_G=\frac{1}{12}ml^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure what ##r## to use for my ##(a_g)_Y## value
I have tried multipule values of ##r## such as 6,3 and ##r_c## none yield the correct answer.
 

Attachments

  • Hibbeler14.ch17.p102a.jpg
    Hibbeler14.ch17.p102a.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 593
Physics news on Phys.org
Why have you set the horizontal net force equal to zero in your first equation? As the rod falls, won't its centre of gravity move? For instance, the final centre of gravity will be further right than the centre of gravity when the rod's pivoting collar was at the very top of the quarter circle pipe.

Are you using ##a_G## to refer to the acceleration of the rod's centre of mass and ##(a_G)_y## to refer to the vertical component of that acceleration? If so, won't you just have ##(a_G)_y=\frac{l\alpha\cos\theta}{2}##, since the centre of mass is at radius ##\frac{l}{2}## from the (moving) point on the ground about which the rod is rotating?
 
andrewkirk said:
Why have you set the horizontal net force equal to zero in your first equation? As the rod falls, won't its centre of gravity move? For instance, the final centre of gravity will be further right than the centre of gravity when the rod's pivoting collar was at the very top of the quarter circle pipe.

Are you using ##a_G## to refer to the acceleration of the rod's centre of mass and ##(a_G)_y## to refer to the vertical component of that acceleration? If so, won't you just have ##(a_G)_y=\frac{l\alpha\cos\theta}{2}##, since the centre of mass is at radius ##\frac{l}{2}## from the (moving) point on the ground about which the rod is rotating?

Let me make this a little bit clearer the rod is released from rest at 30 degrees. Now I don't have to worry about horizontal motion.
 
The initial horizontal velocity of the CoM being zero does not entail that the horizontal accel of the CoM is zero.

Further, if we take the centre of the quarter circle as the origin, then the x coordinate of the CoM of the rod is initially ##3\cdot(1-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2})\approx 0.4##, whereas once the rod has fallen flat the x coordinate will be ##3\cdot(\sqrt{2}-1)\approx 1.2##. So the CoM must move horizontally.
 
But at the instant theta is 30 degrees it is released from rest. So imagine a hand holding the rod and as soon as it is released the rod has no initial angular velocity. The normal component of the acceleration is obviously 0 at that instant but there is tangential acceleration of the rod.
 
The picture you see is the rod being released from rest at that angle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K