Find the Composion of this relation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jakes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
Jakes
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A = {1,2,3}
B= {a,b,c}
c = {x,y,z}

R = {(1,a) (2,c) (3,a) (3,c)}
S = {(b,x) (b,z) (c,y)}

Find RoS (composition of relation)my solution was this:
(2,c) belongs to R and (c,y) belongs to S so (2,y) belongs to RoS
(3,c) belongs to R and (c,y) belongs to S so (3,y) belongs to Ros
RoS={(2,y) 3,y}

can we use (c,y) more than one time..
Is this correct answer ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think you are finding the composition relation S\circ R since
R is relation from A to B and S is relation from B to C. So if you are seeking
S\circ R , then your your first two lines are correct but the final answer
is not since you forgot to put brackets for (3,y) .so

S\circ R=\{(2,y),(3,y)\}

and its ok to use (c,y) more than one time
 
If you are indeed looking for RoS, then note that S "takes b into" both x and z but there is no pair in R having x or z as a first member. Similarly, S "takes c into" y but there is no pair in R having y as first member. RoS does not exist (or is the empty relation).


To find SoR, R "takes 1 to" a but there is no pair in S with first member a so there is no pair in SoR with first member 1. R "takes 2 to" c and S "takes c to y" so SoR contains (2, y). R "take 3 to" both a and c. There is no pair in S with first member a but S "takes c to" y so (3, y) is in RoS.
 
Thanks both of you :)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top