Find the function phi(r,t) given its partial derivatives.

stedwards
Messages
416
Reaction score
46
I would like to define t^*= \phi(r, t) given dt^* = \left( 1-\frac{k}{r} \right) dt + 0dr where k is a constant.

Perhaps it doesn't exist. It appears so simple, yet I've been running around in circles. Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want ##dt^*## to be an exact form, so that you can integrate it. An exact form can be expressed as

$$ df = M dx + N dy,~~~M = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x},~~~N = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y},$$

therefore a necessary condition that ##df## be exact is that

$$ \frac{\partial M}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial N}{\partial x}.$$

The corresponding relation for ##dt^*## fails, so we conclude that it is not exact and the corresponding ##t^*(r,t)## does not exist.
 
  • Like
Likes beyondthemaths, stedwards and HallsofIvy
Nicely done. Thank you!
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...

Similar threads

Back
Top