How can I prove the space diagonal of a cuboid using the sum of squares?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the space diagonal of a cuboid, denoted as d_abc, equals the square root of the sum of the squares of its side lengths, expressed as d_abc = (a^2 + b^2 + c^2)^(0.5). The user attempts to derive this using the Pythagorean theorem, breaking the diagonal into two segments, y and z, and establishing equations for each segment. They express the relationship between the face diagonal and the space diagonal but encounter difficulty in progressing further. The solution involves substituting the equation for the face diagonal into the equation for the space diagonal and taking the square root. The conclusion emphasizes that this relationship holds for any cuboid, with a perfect cuboid being a specific case where all dimensions are integers.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
im trying to proove that d_abc=(a^2+b^2+c^2)^0.5
that the space diagonal of a cuboid equals the square root of the sum of the squares of the side lengths.
here is the picture of cuboid and the diagonals:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PerfectCuboid.html

now here's what i did:
{y}={the part of the space diagonal from the face diagonal d_bc till it touches c}
{z}={the rest of the sapce diagonal}
y^2=a^2+x^2
z^2=(c-x)^2+b^2
z+y=d_abc=(a^2+x^2)^0.5+[(c-x)^2+b^2]^0.5
from here I am stuck, can someone help me understand what should i do.

p.s- it's not hw.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
From pythagorus's theorum, we know that:

{d_{ab}}^{ 2} = a^2 + b^2

Also from pythagorus's theroum we known that:

{d_{abc}}^2 = {d_{ab}}^2 + c^2

simply substitue the first equation into the second and find the root and you get:

d_{abc} = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2 + c^2
 
Last edited:
PS. the above holds true for any cuboid, a perfect cuboid isonly a special cae where all the edges and diagonals are intergers.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top