Find the mass of object knowing the applied force and coefficient of friction

AI Thread Summary
To find the mass of an object given a force of 45 Newtons and a coefficient of friction of 0.26, the frictional force can be equated to the applied force since it is just enough to overcome friction. The equation for frictional force is frictional force = coefficient of friction x weight. By substituting the known values into the equation, 45 = 0.26m(9.8), the mass can be calculated as m = 17.65 kg. This approach clarifies that the applied force equals the frictional force, allowing for the determination of mass. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving similar physics problems.
liz777
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If a force of 45 Newtons is needed to overcome friction and the coefficient of friction=0.26, what is the mass of the object?

The Attempt at a Solution



So would I need to find the frictional force first? But then I can't use the equation: (frictional force=coefficient of friction x weight) since I don't have the mass. I also thought about using the equation F=MA but then I don't have the acceleration, the friction, or the net force! Any help, I'm really stuck?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
liz777 said:
So would I need to find the frictional force first?
They give you the friction force. The way to interpret the given information is that the 45 N force is just enough to overcome friction, thus that force equals the friction.
But then I can't use the equation: (frictional force=coefficient of friction x weight) since I don't have the mass.
Sure you can use that equation. Remember that you're asked to find the mass.
 
Ok, so what you're saying is that the applied force equals the friction, in this case. I thought it wouldn't move though if that was true? I'm just confused on this concept.

But anyway, using that information, frictional force=coefficient of friction x weight
45=0.26m(9.8)
45=2.55m
m=17.65kg
Is that right?
 
Yes.
You are given two values, and you need to solve for one of them using an equation with four variables, three of which are known (the other being g).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top