Chemistry Find the molecules by interpreting the H NMR spectroscopy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on interpreting H NMR spectroscopy to identify three compounds with the formula C6H12O2. Users analyze the integration ratios from the spectra, noting degrees of unsaturation for each graph. The first spectrum shows a 2:3:2:2:3 ratio, the second a 1:3:2:3:3 ratio, and the third a simpler 1:3 ratio. The challenge lies in determining the connectivity of the protons based on these integrations. Ultimately, the user successfully deduces the structures after careful consideration of the NMR data.
STLCards002
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a 3 compounds with the same formula: C6H12O2
I need to find the molecules by interpreting the H NMR spectroscopy

http://aceorganic.pearsoncmg.com/epoch-plugin/tempfiles/1867_430.jpg
http://aceorganic.pearsoncmg.com/epoch-plugin/tempfiles/1869_524.jpg
http://aceorganic.pearsoncmg.com/epoch-plugin/tempfiles/1871_526.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution

[/B]
I've tried so many structures that it would be pointless to name them off.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't start with structures - start with the spectrum. What does integration tell you about number of hydrogens? What does formula tell about saturation?
 
Well I know (atleast I think) the integrations;
1st graph: 2:3:2:2:3; One degree of unsaturation
2nd graph: 1:3:2:3:3; One degree of unsaturation
3rd graph: 1:3; One degree of unsaturation

But then I can't put everything together. I spend atleast an hour one each of these but can't figure out there connectivity.
 
3rd seems to be the simplest. 1:3 - you have two types of protons. How many of each type?
 
Each spike counts as 3 Hydrogens...so a CH3 and then 4 CH3?
 
I figured them out. Thanks for the help.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top