Find the points where electric potential is zero?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a point where the electric potential is zero between two charges, 2 C and 3 C, positioned 100 cm apart. It concludes that no such point exists when both charges are of the same sign, as the electric potential remains positive everywhere due to the nature of the fields created by these charges. The conversation also highlights that a zero potential point can occur if the charges have opposite signs, as the combined potential can yield a zero value at certain locations. Additionally, there is confusion about whether the original question pertains to electric potential or electric field, suggesting a need for clarity in the problem statement. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that with the given charges, a zero potential point cannot be found.
Hardik Batra
Messages
130
Reaction score
5
There are two charges 2 C and 3 C and 100 cm apart from each other.
Find a point where electric potential is zero? Consider 2 C charge on the origin.I have tried out but don't get it solution...
1) If you take point between two charges then

2 C----------100 cm------------------3 C
<------x-------><-----(100-x)-------->

then you will get x= -200 cm that is not possible?2) If you take point left side of the 2 C then

x= -40 cm that is not possible?

3) If you take point right side of the 3 C then

x = -60 cm that is also not possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hardik Batra said:
There are two charges 2 C and 3 C and 100 cm apart from each other.
Find a point where electric potential is zero? Consider 2 C charge on the origin.

I have tried out but don't get it solution...
That is because there is no solution. Potential at a point can be defined as the work needed to bring a unit charge from infinity to that point. As long as the 2C and 3C charges both have the same sign, the path from infinity to any finite point will be uphill against a non-zero electrical force all (or most) of the way.

So all finite points will have positive potential.

A more rigorous way to see it is that the potential field from the 2C charge is clearly positive everywhere. And the potential field from the 3C charge is also clearly positive everywhere. The combined field from both is just the sum. It must also be positive everywhere.
 
Last edited:
jbriggs444 said:
A more rigorous way to see it is that the potential field from the 2C charge is clearly positive everywhere. And the potential field from the 3C charge is also clearly positive everywhere. The combined field from both is just the sum. It must also be positive everywhere.

Suppose there are 3C and -2C charges then combined charge is 1C. this is positive charge then also you get the zero potential position.
 
Hardik Batra said:
Suppose there are 3C and -2C charges then combined charge is 1C. this is positive charge then also you get the zero potential position.

The equations that you solved the first time around need to take account of the sign of the two charges. In this version of the problem (with opposite signs on the two charges) the potential gets very large and positive near the 3C charge and verly large and negative near the -2C charge. It follows that there must a zero between them.

There should be another solution that is not between the two charges.
 
Hardik Batra said:
There are two charges 2 C and 3 C and 100 cm apart from each other.
Find a point where electric potential is zero?

Are you sure the question didn't ask that you find where the electric field is zero?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top