TytoAlba95
- 132
- 19
- Homework Statement
- See below
- Relevant Equations
- See below
Where did I go wrong?
So of the four potential answers, only two of them should be considered.Delta2 said:(hint: the triangle is isosceles)
Very well i find your reasoning correct. You used the triangular inequality. I had another reasoning in my mind using the cosine law. Let me know if you want to hear it.TytoAlba95 said:The other side can be between, (7+3=)10 and (7-3=)4 cm, being an isosceles triangle, the third side should be either 7 or 3. As 3 is below the range so 7cm is the length of the other side. Thanks for the pointer.
Which is fine, but requires calculation that probably can't be done in one's head. A variation of the technique used by the OP is to draw two isosceles triangles: one with two sides of 3 units, and the other with two sides of 7 units. Pretty clearly the one with a pair of sides of 3 units can't also have a side of 7 units, but the one with a pair of 7 unit sides can have a third side of 3 units.Delta2 said:I had another reasoning in my mind using the cosine law.
It is not that hard. Take a triangle isosceles with two sides of 3. We can prove using the cosine law that the third side has an upper bound of 6.Mark44 said:Which is fine, but requires calculation that probably can't be done in one's head. A variation of the technique used by the OP is to draw two isosceles triangles: one with two sides of 3 units, and the other with two sides of 7 units. Pretty clearly the one with a pair of sides of 3 units can't also have a side of 7 units, but the one with a pair of 7 unit sides can have a third side of 3 units.
Delta2 said:It is not that hard. Take a triangle isosceles with two sides of 3. We can prove using the cosine law that the third side has an upper bound of 6.
No it isnt. Using the triangular inequality is probably the simplest way.Office_Shredder said:That's not exactly the simplest way to prove 6 is the upper bound.