MHB Find value of x and area of parallelogram: a,b,c,P

AI Thread Summary
To find the value of x in vector a = (2, x, 0) such that the angle between vectors a and b = (1, 0, -1) is π/4, the cosine formula for angles between vectors is applied. The dot product of a and b, along with their magnitudes, is used to establish the relationship needed to solve for x. Once x is determined, the area of the parallelogram formed by the unit vector in the direction of b and vector c = (5, -9, 3) can be calculated using the cross product. The area is given by the magnitude of the vector product of the two vectors. This approach effectively combines vector algebra with geometric principles to solve the problem.
Niamh1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello, could someone please help me with this question? I don't even know where to begin.

Given vectors a = (2, x, 0), b = (1, 0, −1) and c = (5, −9, 3), and let P(2, 1, −1)
be a point. Find the value of x in a such that the angle between a and b is π/4, then find the area of parallelogram with adjacent sides are bˆ and c, where bˆ is the unit vector in the direction of b
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You should use the following facts.

The cosine of angle between $$v_1=(x_1,y_1,z_1)$$ and $v_2=(x_2,y_2,z_2)$ is $\dfrac{v_1\cdot v_2}{|v_1|\cdot|v_2|}$. Here $v_1\cdot v_2=x_1x_2+y_1y_2+z_1z_2$ is the dot product, or scalar product, of $v_1$ and $v_2$. The length of $v_1$ is denoted by $|v_1|$ and equals $\sqrt{v_1\cdot v_1}$.

The unit vector in the direction of $v$ is $\dfrac{v}{|v|}$.

The signed area of the parallelogram with adjacent sides $$v_1=(x_1,y_1,z_1)$$ and $v_2=(x_2,y_2,z_2)$ is $|v_1\times v_2|$. Here $v_1\times v_2$ is the vector product of $v_1$ and $v_2$, and it equals $\begin{vmatrix}i&j&k\\x_1&y_1&z_1\\x_2&y_2&z_2\end{vmatrix}$, where $i$, $j$ and $k$ are mutually perpendicular unit vectors in the directions of the coordinate axes.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
You should use the following facts.

The cosine of angle between $$v_1=(x_1,y_1,z_1)$$ and $v_2=(x_2,y_2,z_2)$ is $\dfrac{v_1\cdot v_2}{|v_1|\cdot|v_2|}$. Here $v_1\cdot v_2=x_1x_2+y_1y_2+z_1z_2$ is the dot product, or scalar product, of $v_1$ and $v_2$. The length of $v_1$ is denoted by $|v_1|$ and equals $\sqrt{v_1\cdot v_1}$.

The unit vector in the direction of $v$ is $\dfrac{v}{|v|}$.

The signed area of the parallelogram with adjacent sides $$v_1=(x_1,y_1,z_1)$$ and $v_2=(x_2,y_2,z_2)$ is $|v_1\times v_2|$. Here $v_1\times v_2$ is the vector product of $v_1$ and $v_2$, and it equals $\begin{vmatrix}i&j&k\\x_1&y_1&z_1\\x_2&y_2&z_2\end{vmatrix}$, where $i$, $j$ and $k$ are mutually perpendicular unit vectors in the directions of the coordinate axes.

Because the rule of the cosine of the angle is not entirely obvious, if you have two vectors $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathbf{a} \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathbf{b} \end{align*}$, then they can form two sides of a triangle, with the third side being the vector $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathbf{a} - \mathbf{b} \end{align*}$. Then if $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \theta \end{align*}$ is the angle between vectors $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathbf{a} \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathbf{b} \end{align*}$, we can relate the four pieces of information with the cosine rule:

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| \mathbf{a} - \mathbf{b} \right| ^2 &= \left| \mathbf{a} \right| ^2 + \left| \mathbf{b} \right| ^2 - 2\,\left| \mathbf{a}\right| \left| \mathbf{b}\right| \, \cos{ \left( \theta \right) } \\ \left( a_1 - b_1 \right) ^2 + \left( a_2 - b_2 \right) ^2 + \left( a_3 - b_3 \right) ^2 &= \left| \mathbf{a} \right| ^2 + \left| \mathbf{b} \right| ^2 - 2\,\left| \mathbf{a} \right| \left| \mathbf{b} \right| \,\cos{ \left( \theta \right) } \\ a_1^2 -2\,a_1\,b_1 + b_1^2 + a_2^2 - 2\,a_2\,b_2 + b_2^2 + a_3^2 -2\,a_3\,b_3 + b_3^2 &= \left| \mathbf{a} \right| ^2 + \left| \mathbf{b} \right| ^2 - 2\,\left| \mathbf{a} \right| \left| \mathbf{b} \right| \,\cos{ \left( \theta \right) } \\ a_1^2 + a_2^2 + a_3^2 + b_1^2 + b_2^2 + b_3^2 - 2\,\left( a_1\,b_1 + a_2\,b_2 + a_3\,b_3 \right) &= \left| \mathbf{a} \right| ^2 + \left| \mathbf{b} \right| ^2 - 2\,\left| \mathbf{a} \right| \left| \mathbf{b} \right| \,\cos{ \left( \theta \right) } \\ \left| \mathbf{a} \right| ^2 + \left| \mathbf{b} \right| ^2 - 2\,\mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{b} &= \left| \mathbf{a} \right| ^2 + \left| \mathbf{b} \right| ^2 - 2\,\left| \mathbf{a} \right| \left| \mathbf{b} \right| \,\cos{ \left( \theta \right) } \\ -2\,\mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{b} &= -2\,\left| \mathbf{a} \right| \left| \mathbf{b} \right| \,\cos{ \left( \theta \right) } \\ \mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{b} &= \left| \mathbf{a} \right| \left| \mathbf{b} \right|\,\cos{ \left( \theta \right) } \\ \cos{ \left( \theta \right) } &= \frac{\mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{b}}{\left| \mathbf{a} \right| \left| \mathbf{b} \right| } \end{align*}$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top