Find Velocity of Rod Center of Mass When Making 30° Angle with Horizontal

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the velocity of the center of mass (CoM) of a falling rod when it makes a 30° angle with the horizontal. Participants explore the concepts of instantaneous axis of rotation and conservation of energy to derive the velocity equations. There is a clarification on the motion of the rod, specifically how the lower end slips backward while the CoM falls vertically, allowing for the rotation of the rod. The conversation also addresses the line of action of velocity in relation to the forces acting on the CoM. Overall, the thread emphasizes the relationship between the CoM's motion and the dynamics of the rod's rotation.
Satvik Pandey
Messages
591
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


A thin rigid rod of length ##l## is placed perfectly vertical on a smooth ground. A slight disturbance on the upper end of rod causes lower end of rod to slip along the ground and rod starts falling down. Find velocity of center of mass of rod when the rod makes ##30## with horizontal.

2.Relevant equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I first tried to find the instantaneous axis of rotation--
Untitled.png


So distance of IAOR from Com of rod is ## l cos\theta /2 ##

Now by conservation of energy

##\frac { mgl(1-sin\theta ) }{ 2 } =\frac { 1 }{ 2 } \left( \frac { m{ l }^{ 2 } }{ 12 } +\frac { m{ l }^{ 2 }{ cos }^{ 2 }\theta }{ 4 } \right) { \omega }^{ 2 }##

Also ##{ V }_{ CM }=\omega \frac { lcos\theta }{ 2 } ##

From these two equations I got ##{ V }_{ CM }=\sqrt { \frac { 9gl }{ 26 } } ##

I have confusion that why the lower end of the rod started moving backward.
I know that as only vertical force mg acts on the rod so the CoM of the rod falls vertically.
But why the lower end of the rod sliped backward?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the COM falls vertically and the rod rotates how do the upper end and lower end move?
 
  • Like
Likes Satvik Pandey
ehild said:
If the COM falls vertically and the rod rotates how do the upper end and lower end move?

So does the lower end of the rod slipped backward in order to allow the CoM of the rod to fall vertically?
 
Satvik Pandey said:
So does the lower end of the rod slipped backward in order to allow the CoM of the rod to fall vertically?
Yes, and the upper end turns forward. You can describe the motion as the vertical falling of the COM and rotation about the COM.
 
  • Like
Likes Satvik Pandey
ehild said:
Yes, and the upper end turns forward. You can describe the motion as the vertical falling of the COM and rotation about the COM.

I tried to draw the line of action of the velocity of the upper end of the rod.
Untitled.png

Here the red line shows the velocity of the upper end of the rod due to rotation. The red line is perpendicular to the to the black line.

And blue line shows the velocity of upper end of the rod due to vertical fall of CoM.

And green vector is the resultant of blue and red vector.
Does green vector correctly shows the line of action of the velocity of the upper end of the rod?
 
Satvik Pandey said:
Does green vector correctly shows the line of action of the velocity of the upper end of the rod?
Yes, in principle. You get the velocity of the ends as the vector sum of the velocity of the COM and the velocity of the end of rod with respect to the COM.
 
I also solved this question without using IAOR.

By conservation of energy

##\frac{mgl(1-sin\theta)}{2}=\frac{mv^{2}}{2} + \frac{I \omega^{2}}{2}##
Untitled.png

Velocity of the lower end of the rod in vertical direction is 0

So ## V_{com}=\frac{l \omega cos\theta}{2} ##

Using these two equations I got

## V=\sqrt { \frac { 3{ cos }^{ 2 }\theta (1-sin\theta )gl }{ 3{ cos }^{ 2 }\theta +1 } } ##

Is it right?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes ehild
When we have to draw the line of action of the velocity(acceleration) of the CoM of a rigid body we first shift all the forces acting on the rigidbody to its CoM and then we find the resultant of the forces. Does the line of action of velocity(acceleration) is similar to the direction of the resultant force acting on the CoM of the body?
 
Satvik Pandey said:
## V=\sqrt { \frac { 3{ cos }^{ 2 }\theta (1-sin\theta )gl }{ 3{ cos }^{ 2 }\theta +1 } } ##

Is it right?
Correct! :cool:
 
  • #10
Satvik Pandey said:
When we have to draw the line of action of the velocity(acceleration) of the CoM of a rigid body we first shift all the forces acting on the rigidbody to its CoM and then we find the resultant of the forces. Does the line of action of velocity(acceleration) is similar to the direction of the resultant force acting on the CoM of the body?

I know what is the line of action of a force but I do not know what you mean on the line of action of velocity.

In case of the motion of a rigid body in a plane, the motion is equivalent to the motion of the CoM under the effect of all the external forces, applied at the CoM, accompanied with a rotation about the CoM.
 
  • Like
Likes Satvik Pandey
  • #11
ehild said:
I know what is the line of action of a force but I do not know what you mean on the line of action of velocity.

In case of the motion of a rigid body in a plane, the motion is equivalent to the motion of the CoM under the effect of all the external forces, applied at the CoM, accompanied with a rotation about the CoM.

I think Line of action of velocity is not the correct word.

Suppose there is rod resting in a wedge.(as shown in figure 1). When the system is released it will took the shape somewhat similar to (figure 2)(assume all surfaces to be friction less).Suppose we are asked to find the direction in which the CoM of rod will move.
Untitled.png

I think first I have to draw the FBD of the rod.(please see figure 3)

Then I shifted all forces to the CoM of the rod.
Untitled.png

Clearly mg is greater than N2.

Does the green arrow correctly show the direction in which CoM of rod will move?

Green vector is resultant of the three forces (mg,N1,N2).
 
  • #12
N1 is wrong.
 
  • #13
ehild said:
N1 is wrong.

Oh! Its direction is wrong. It should be perpendicular to the contact surface.
Untitled.png

Does green arrow correctly shows the direction in which the CoM of the the rod will move.

Green vector is the resultant of the forces N1,N2 amd mg.
 
  • #14
I do not see why do you draw those arrows, but yes, the CoM moves downward and to the right. And I do not think that mg is smaller than N2 .
 
  • Like
Likes Satvik Pandey
  • #15
ehild said:
I do not see why do you draw those arrows, but yes, the CoM moves downward and to the right. And I do not think that mg is smaller than N2 .

As the CoM of the rod moves downward so mg should be greater than N2.

Does the CoM of the rod moves in the resultant of N1,N2 and mg?
 
  • #16
Satvik Pandey said:
Does the CoM of the rod moves in the resultant of N1,N2 and mg?

Yes.
 
  • #17
ehild said:
Yes.

Thank you ehild.
You are awesome.
 
Back
Top