Find Vx: Inductor Assumed to Have No Energy Stored

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tritium_3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Inductor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving for Vx in an RL circuit with a dependent voltage source and an independent current source, where the inductor is assumed to have no energy stored initially. The node voltage method is employed, leading to the equation 2.5v1 - 1.2Vx = 6000u(t). The participants clarify that the inductor's lack of stored energy means no initial current flows through it, effectively treating it as a short circuit at time t=0. The voltage source is constant, while the current source is time-dependent, switching from zero to 100 amps at t=t0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RL circuits and their components
  • Familiarity with node voltage analysis
  • Knowledge of unit step functions in circuit analysis
  • Concept of energy storage in inductors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the node voltage method in RL circuits
  • Learn about the behavior of inductors during step changes in voltage
  • Explore the implications of dependent and independent sources in circuit analysis
  • Investigate the mathematical representation of unit step functions in circuit equations
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone studying transient analysis in RL circuits will benefit from this discussion.

tritium_3
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find Vx for all t
inductor assumed to have no energy stored

[PLAIN]http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/773/circuitgt.jpg

Homework Equations



inductor v = L di/dt

unit step = 1 for t>0,
= 0 for t<=0

The Attempt at a Solution



using node voltage method, ground at the bottom, and "v1" for the top node

v1 = Ldi/dt ?
(v1 - .8 vx)/40 - 100u(t) + v1/60 = 0

2.5 v1 - 1.2Vx = 6000 u(t)

i fail.

Help anyone?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
"RL circuit with dependent voltage source and indep. current source with unit step"

Do you know what this shorthand means?

And do you know what the shorthand "inductor assumed to have no energy stored" means?

This looks like hasty notes scibbled in class, as the professor talks to fast. But it's important to know what these mean.
 
Phrak said:
"RL circuit with dependent voltage source and indep. current source with unit step"

Do you know what this shorthand means?

And do you know what the shorthand "inductor assumed to have no energy stored" means?

This looks like hasty notes scibbled in class, as the professor talks to fast. But it's important to know what these mean.

OK, maybe the title isn't accurate of the circuit, but i listed everything in the circuit. excuse me if it has some other meaning.

and also I was trying to add addtional details, saying that there was no mention of stored charge in the inductor. But this problem isn't a tranisent problem anyway, so that has no relevance..

these are not scribbled notes, this is a homework assignment, on a printed piece of paper. It seems the instructor wrote this up too fast.

But If you cannot help me, just say nothing at all. I am no closer to finding the solution if you simply just question my methods of describing the problem.
 
tritium_3 said:
OK, maybe the title isn't accurate of the circuit, but i listed everything in the circuit. excuse me if it has some other meaning.

and also I was trying to add addtional details, saying that there was no mention of stored charge in the inductor. But this problem isn't a tranisent problem anyway, so that has no relevance..

these are not scribbled notes, this is a homework assignment, on a printed piece of paper. It seems the instructor wrote this up too fast.

But If you cannot help me, just say nothing at all. I am no closer to finding the solution if you simply just question my methods of describing the problem.

No, no. The idea on this forum is that you show some work to get help. "Dependent" in this case means time dependent. The voltage of the voltage source is a function of time; it's time dependent. The current source is constant.

"Inductor assumed to have no energy stored" can't mean anything except that at some initial time there is no current flowing in the inductor. An inductor with current has stored energy, W=(1/2)Li2. So when you set up your problem, at time t0, set the current in the branch containing the inductor to zero.

You've been handed a lousy problem set-up. "unit step" is the function u(t) so it seems, so the current steps from zero to 100 amps at time t=t0.
 
Last edited:
right. I was just using the notion commonly used in my textbook. The voltage source is dependent because it depends on the value of Vx. The current source is independent since it provides 100Amps constantly no matter what, after time 0. Using circle as independent, and diamond as dependent. that's all i meant.


thanks for the hint. i see that from -infinity to 0 the current hasn't changed, so the V in inductor is 0.
this makes the inductor a short circuit.
[PLAIN]http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/8251/circuit2b.jpg



this is at time 0-
from -infinity to right before current source turns on.
[PLAIN]http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/8900/circuit2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tritium_3 said:
right. I was just using the notion commonly used in my textbook. The voltage source is dependent because it depends on the value of Vx. The current source is independent since it provides 100Amps constantly no matter what, after time 0. Using circle as independent, and diamond as dependent. that's all i meant.


thanks for the hint. i see that from -infinity to 0 the current hasn't changed, so the V in inductor is 0.

You have everything right, but backwards. It's the language that is confusing you.

The voltage source is said to be indepentent of time, because it doesn't change over time. It's constant.

The current source changes at the time, t0, so it is said to be dependent upon time.

Initially, at time, t0 there is no current flowing in the capacitor so it looks like an open circuit. It looks like an infinite valued restistor for just a moment.

At time t0 the current suddenly changes from zero to 100 amps. This places a voltage across the 40 ohm resistor. This places a voltage across the inductor. When a step change in voltage is placed across the inductor, the current will initially increase at a constant rate. But it starts at zero.

I have to go; it's 3:30 AM here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K