MHB Find x and y in x+y=3421 and 23% of x + 13.5% of y = 684.34

  • Thread starter Thread starter northuk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves solving the equations x + y = 3421 and 0.23x + 0.135y = 684.34. By substituting y from the first equation into the second, the equations can be simplified to find the value of x. After calculations, x is approximately determined to be 1816, leading to y being approximately 1605. The solution is rounded to the nearest integer for accuracy based on the significant figures provided. The values of x and y satisfy both original equations.
northuk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I need help with the following problem. I will appreciate any help to solve this:

x+y=3421
23% of x + 13.5% of y = 684.34

What are the values of x and y so the both of above equations give correct answers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
northuk said:
I need help with the following problem. I will appreciate any help to solve this:

x+y=3421
23% of x + 13.5% of y = 684.34

What are the values of x and y so the both of above equations give correct answers.
"23% of x + 13.5% of y = 684.34" is equivalent to the equation
0.23x+ 0.135y= 684.34.

x+ y= 3421 is the same as y= 3421- x so the second equation can be written
0.23x+ 0.135(3421- x)= 684.34.

0.135*3421= 461.835 so that equation is the same as 0.23x+ 461.835- 0.135x= 684.34.

We can write that as (0.23- 0.135)x= 684.34- 461.835 and, doing the arithmetic,
0.095x= 172.505 so x= 172.505/0.095= 1816, approximately. Then y= 3421- x= 3421- 1816= 1605. Again, approximately. I have rounded to the nearest integer. Since one the given data had only 2 significant figures that should be accurate enough.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top