MHB Find x and y in x+y=3421 and 23% of x + 13.5% of y = 684.34

  • Thread starter Thread starter northuk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves solving the equations x + y = 3421 and 0.23x + 0.135y = 684.34. By substituting y from the first equation into the second, the equations can be simplified to find the value of x. After calculations, x is approximately determined to be 1816, leading to y being approximately 1605. The solution is rounded to the nearest integer for accuracy based on the significant figures provided. The values of x and y satisfy both original equations.
northuk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I need help with the following problem. I will appreciate any help to solve this:

x+y=3421
23% of x + 13.5% of y = 684.34

What are the values of x and y so the both of above equations give correct answers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
northuk said:
I need help with the following problem. I will appreciate any help to solve this:

x+y=3421
23% of x + 13.5% of y = 684.34

What are the values of x and y so the both of above equations give correct answers.
"23% of x + 13.5% of y = 684.34" is equivalent to the equation
0.23x+ 0.135y= 684.34.

x+ y= 3421 is the same as y= 3421- x so the second equation can be written
0.23x+ 0.135(3421- x)= 684.34.

0.135*3421= 461.835 so that equation is the same as 0.23x+ 461.835- 0.135x= 684.34.

We can write that as (0.23- 0.135)x= 684.34- 461.835 and, doing the arithmetic,
0.095x= 172.505 so x= 172.505/0.095= 1816, approximately. Then y= 3421- x= 3421- 1816= 1605. Again, approximately. I have rounded to the nearest integer. Since one the given data had only 2 significant figures that should be accurate enough.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top