Finding a function for rate of change

PennyPuzzleBox
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I was wondering if somebody could help me develop an answer to the question below.

I would like to calculate a rate of change of the following function:

θ = arctan (a * (tan β)) where "a" is a constant.

By the way, the shape of the curve -- angle alpha as a function of angle Beta --resembles an arm of a parabola. Angle Beta increases with angle alpha, but less so with increasing values.

I would like to derive a function that would describe the instantaneous rate of change at each point of that curve. It would be great if the function would say: hey, this is an arm of a parabola! :)

Unfortunately I took math a very long time ago... I believe I would
need to find the derivative of the function? Could you kindly help me out with this?
thnx

Penny
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The whole point of the "derivative" is that it is the rate of change of a function. The derivative of arctan(x), with respect to x, is 1/(1+ x^2). The derivative of tan(x) is sec^2(x).

So, by the "chain rule", with f= arctan(u) ,u= a tan(x), df/du= 1/(1+ u^2) and du/dx= a sec^2(x), so df/dx= (df/du)(du/dx)= (1/(1+ u^2))(a sec^(x)= (a sec^2(x))/(1+a^2tan^2(x).
 
^ What HallsOfIvy said

If you're looking for an easy way to find derivatives and do other mathsy things, look up wolfram alpha. It's a website that is quite excellent.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top