Finding a vector field perpendicular to the surface of a sphere

AI Thread Summary
To determine if a vector field is perpendicular to the surface of a sphere, the field must be a scalar multiple of the radius vector at each point on the sphere. The challenge arises when trying to use the cross product in spherical coordinates, which complicates the process. An alternative method is needed to assess the perpendicularity without relying on the cross product. The desired vector field can be expressed as F = f(θ, φ)ρ, where f is a scalar function. This approach simplifies the evaluation of the vector field's orientation relative to the sphere's surface.
walking_edges
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to figure out if a given vector field is perpendicular at the surface of a sphere of radius R. The vector field is given in spherical coordinates.

I initially attempted to take the cross product of the vector field with the normal vector at the surface of the sphere to see if it was zero, but unfortunately, the cross product in spherical coordinates is much too difficult to work with. I'm hoping to find an alternative method.

Does anyone know how to find out if a vector field is perpendicular to a surface without using the cross product?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At each point on the sphere the field would have to be a multiple of the radius vector. Something like

\vec F = f(\theta,\phi)\vec \rho

where f is a scalar.
 
Thank you very much!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top