Finding Absolute Uncertainty Using Formulas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the volume and absolute uncertainty of a sphere given its circumference and associated error. The user initially solved the problem by averaging volume values derived from the low and high circumference measurements, resulting in a final volume of 0.01589 m³ with an uncertainty of ±0.00049 m³. However, they seek clarification on using specific formulas for absolute uncertainty involving constants and exponents, expressing confusion over the necessity of these methods. The conversation also touches on the formatting of mathematical expressions in forum posts. Understanding the formulas for calculating uncertainty is essential for accurate scientific reporting.
Coop
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello,

I have solved the problem, but not the way the writer intended. I need help figuring out how they wanted me to do it.

Here's the problem:

The circumference of a sphere is found to be 0.98 m +/- 0.01 m. Calculate the volume and absolute error with five digits to the right of the decimal.

Homework Equations


C = 2∏r
V = (4/3)∏r3


The Attempt at a Solution


I used the low end (.97 m) and high end (.99 m) circumference measurement to solve for two radii. Then I plugged those into the volume equation and got to volume values: .01541 m3 and .01639 m3. Averaging those volumes I found the final volume to be .01589 m3.

To find the absolute uncertainty I merely subtracted the high end circumference value from the low end one and divided by two.

∴ volume = .01589 m3 +/- .00049 m3.

But my question is, they wanted me to find absolute uncertainty using the following formulas:

Δ[constant]X = [constant]*ΔX to account for constants
(Δtotal/final value) = |n| * [(ΔX)/X] to find uncertainty values where n is an exponent on A
ΔX = [(ΔX)/X] * X to convert from relative to absolute error

...where Δ stands for uncertainty

How would I do this?

It seems a lot more confusing for no reason, but would there be any case when I wouldn't be able to use my method and would have to use these formulas?

P.S. Is there anyway to code when writing these? Like I know for some help sites you can input fractions using commands like \frac{num.}{denom.}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Coop said:
The circumference of a sphere is found to be 0.98 m +/- 0.01 m.

What does this even mean, "circumference of a sphere"?

As to your question, what exactly is unclear in the formulae given to you?

To see how to enter stuff like ##V = \frac 4 3 \pi r^3 ##, click the quote button.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top