Finding Al's Mass in a Momentum Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter JSmith89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
To find Al's mass in the momentum problem, the combined mass of Al and Jo is 167 kg, and their velocities after releasing the spring are 0.897 m/s for Al and -1.09 m/s for Jo. The momentum equation m1v1 + m2v2 = 0 is used, where m1 is Al's mass and m2 is Jo's mass. By substituting m2 with (167 - m1) and correcting Jo's velocity to negative, the equation simplifies to find the correct mass values. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly assigning velocity signs to solve momentum problems accurately.
JSmith89
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two friends, Al and Jo, have a combined mass of 167kg. At an ice skating rink they stand close together on skates, at rest and facing each other, with a compressed spring between them. The spring is kept from pushing them apart, because they are holding each other. When they release their arms, Al moves off in one direction at a speed of .897 m/s, while Jo moves off in the opposite direction, at a speed of 1.09 m/s. Assuming at friction is negligible, find Al's mass.


Homework Equations



m1v1 + m2v2=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm at a loss about how to factor in the combined mass here. You've got v1 and v2 and a combined mass, not individual masses.

m1(.897) + m2(1.09)=0 (What do you do with these masses now??)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, m1 + m2 = 167kg, rearrange the equation. m1 = ?
 
so m1=167-m2

(167-m2)(.897) + m2(1.09)=0
distribute 149.799-.897m2 + 1.09m2=0
combine like terms 149.799+.193m2=0
.193m2=-149.799
m2=-776.16 (which can't be right, because one, it's negative, and two, the masses have to add up to 167, and 776.16 is obviously larger)

did i make a math error somewhere? because i was sure what you said would work
 
You just have a sign problem. If Al moves in one direction at .897m/s, and Jo moves in the 'opposite' direction, the sign of Jo's velocity should be negative (-1.09m/s). Try that and it should work.
 
thanks so much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top