Finding an expression for the total mass of a star

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving an expression for the total mass of a star using the density model ρ=ρ0(1-r/R). The user integrates the mass continuity equation from the center to the stellar radius, leading to the result M=(π/3)ρ0R3, indicating mass is proportional to the product of central density and the cube of the radius. Feedback highlights a critical assumption in the solution: that the central density ρ0 remains constant across different stellar radii. This assumption may oversimplify the model, as it implies uniformity in central density for all stars considered. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the implications of such assumptions in astrophysical modeling.
Physics Dad
Messages
54
Reaction score
1
I have made an attempt at the question below and just wanted to check if my thinking was correct or totally wrong.

Thank you in advance!


1. Homework Statement

In a simple model of a star, the density is described as ρ=ρ0(1-r/R), where R is the stellar radius, and ρ0 is the central density.

Find an expression for the total mass of the star M in terms of ρ0 and R.

Homework Equations


Mass Continuity
dM/dr=4πr2ρ(r)

The Attempt at a Solution


First of all, I know that the density of the star will scale with the radius, as will the mass, so I know I will need to integrate with respect to r from r=0 to r=R (from the centre of the star to the stellar radius).

If I place the equation for ρ0 into the equation for mass continuity...

dM/dr=4πr2ρ0(1-r/R)

and then tidy up a little...

dM=4πρ0(r2-r3/R) dr

then integrate from 0 to R...

M=4πρ0(R3/3-R4/4R)

then tidy up to give...

M=(π/3)ρ0R3

And as π/3 is constant, I can say that...

M∝ρ0R3

This seems a little too simplistic, so would really appreciate some feedback.

Thank you all!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have a background in astrophysics. But from what is given, your answer is correct.

Nonetheless, your solution have a hidden assumption. Which is that ##\rho_{o}## is independent from ##R##.
In other words, your assumption is that the central density ##\rho_{o}## for all stars being modeled is the same, and so the stars central density independent from their radius ##R##
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top