Finding Anti-commuting Complex structures

  • Thread starter Thread starter GcSanchez05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Structures
GcSanchez05
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Say we complex structure J on a space with even dimension. Is there a trick to finding another complex stucture I that anti-commutes with J?

Moreover I'm that these be integrable complex structres. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose I, J are complex structures and

IJ = -JI

i.e., they anticommute. Then

(IJ)^2 = (IJ)(IJ) = -(IJ)(JI) = + I^2 = -1
and hence (IJ) is also a complex structure. Call it K. It is not too hard to verify that these 3 complex structures satisfy the quaternion algebra,

IJ = K, \qquad JK = I, \qquad KI = J, \qquad I^2 = J^2 = K^2 = IJK = -1
Such a manifold is called hyper-Kaehler and must be of dimension 4n. A hyper-Kaehler manifold has holonomy Sp(n). In 4 real dimensions (i.e., n = 1), we have Sp(1) = SU(2). In general, Sp(n) is a subgroup of SU(2n). Hence all hyper-Kaehler manifolds are Calabi-Yau.

So, in order for such a triplet of complex structures to exist, it is at least necessary that the Ricci form vanish. In 4 real dimensions, this condition is also sufficient.

Suppose we're only interested in 4 dimensions. Define the orientation such that the Kaehler form J is anti-self-dual. Then I and K are also anti-self-dual, and orthogonal to J. That is, I, J, and K span the space \Lambda^2_- (M). So if you are given one of the complex structures, you can work out the others algebraically.
 
Well, I understood up to hyperkahler manifolds..

I'm participating in an REU and I think I'm venturing too far from my knowledge. Either way thank you for your explanations!
 
OK, well the general result is:

If two complex structures I, J exist and they anticommute, this implies that a third complex structure K = IJ exists, such that I, J, K are a representation of the unit quaternions. A manifold that has this structure is called "hyper-Kahler".

Only certain manifolds have this property, since it requires, among other things, that the Ricci tensor vanish. So you won't be able to find two anticommuting complex structures in general.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top